Literature DB >> 3905846

Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.

R C Edinger, P C Migneault, F S Nolte.   

Abstract

The API 20E Analytical Profile Index typically suggests three or four conventional biochemical tests to complete the identification of strains either identified to genus only or that have multiple genera consistent with the profile number. We compiled a simple panel of eight rapid (4-h) tests that can substitute for the supplementary biochemical tests recommended by Analytab Products (Plainview, N.Y.). The rapid test panel (RTP) consisted of adonitol, cellobiose, lactose, raffinose, rhamnose, and xylose utilization, lysine decarboxylase activity, and motility. A total of 114 consecutive clinical isolates that required additional tests to complete the identifications were each tested with the complete RTP, as well as with the recommended conventional biochemicals. All discordant identifications were resolved by using an expanded series of conventional biochemical tests. Overall, 110 (96%) strains were identified to the correct genus, and 109 (95%) strains were identified to the correct species by using the RTP, as compared with 105 (92%) identified to the correct genus and 90 (79%) identified to the correct species with the recommended tests. The identifications based on the two supplementary test systems did not agree for 7 (6.1%) strains. Four discrepancies were resolved in favor of the RTP, and three were resolved in favor of the recommended tests. We were unable to identify five (4.4%) strains with the recommended tests and only one (0.9%) with the RTP. A majority (86%) of the test strains were identified to the species level with the RTP after only 4 h of incubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3905846      PMCID: PMC271883          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.1063-1065.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of enterobacteriaceae identification systems. An analysis of College of American Pathologists Survey data.

Authors:  J H Marymont; J H Marymont; T L Gavan
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; K M Tomfohrde; D L Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-09

4.  Rapid test for lysine decarboxylase activity in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D C Brooker; M E Lund; D J Blazevic
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-10

Review 5.  Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens.

Authors:  J J Farmer; B R Davis; F W Hickman-Brenner; A McWhorter; G P Huntley-Carter; M A Asbury; C Riddle; H G Wathen-Grady; C Elias; G R Fanning
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Colony fingerprint for discrimination of microbial species based on lensless imaging of microcolonies.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Maeda; Hironori Dobashi; Yui Sugiyama; Tatsuya Saeki; Tae-Kyu Lim; Manabu Harada; Tadashi Matsunaga; Tomoko Yoshino; Tsuyoshi Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Etiologies of diarrhea and drug susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates among under-five year children in refugee camps in Gambella Region, Ethiopia: a case control study.

Authors:  Getachew Kabew Mekonnen; Bezatu Mengistie; Geremew Sahilu; Helmut Kloos; Worku Mulat
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.090

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.