Literature DB >> 3905576

Prognostic significance of peritumoral vessel invasion in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis.

B W Davis, R Gelber, A Goldhirsch, W H Hartmann, L Hollaway, I Russell, C M Rudenstam.   

Abstract

To assess the prognostic significance of peritumoral vessel invasion, data were examined for 1,510 women entered into the Ludwig Breast Cancer Group Trials I to IV evaluating adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer with axillary nodal metastasis. Vessel invasion by tumor cells was identified by routine light microscopy in 59 per cent (889 of 1,510) of the patients and was equally distributed between premenopausal/perimenopausal (60 per cent, 468 of 778) and postmenopausal (58 per cent, 421 of 732) women. In logrank analyses stratified by nodal status (one to three or four or more positive nodes), the four-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with vessel invasion than in women without vessel invasion (50 per cent versus 65 per cent, P less than 0.0001). This DFS difference was seen for both premenopausal/perimenopausal (P = 0.0004) and postmenopausal (P = 0.0002) patients. The four-year overall survival rate was also lower in patients with vessel invasion (71 per cent versus 82 per cent, P = 0.0006), both for premenopausal/perimenopausal (P = 0.002) and postmenopausal (P = 0.04) women. The presence of vessel invasion was significantly associated with increasing numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes, rising tumor grade, nonstellate tumor border growth pattern, and higher steroid hormone receptor content of the primary tumor. The assessment of peritumoral vessel invasion continued to have prognostic significance for DFS (P less than 0.0001) and overall survival (P = 0.003) when evaluated in multivariate models controlling for treatment assigned, nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, and age. Depending on the subpopulation, patients with vessel invasion had a 41 per cent to 54 per cent greater risk of treatment failure than those without vessel invasion and a 29 per cent to 64 per cent greater risk of death. The percentage of treatment failures at distant sites was higher for women with than for those without vessel invasion (27 per cent versus 18 per cent, P = 0.003). In patients with axillary lymph node metastases, peritumoral vessel invasion may be a sign of increased systemic disease burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3905576     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(85)80033-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  14 in total

1.  Peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion compared with DNA ploidy, proliferative activity, and other pathologic features as prognostic indicators in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  G Gasparini; S Meli; G A Panizzoni; A Visonà; P Boracchi; P Bevilacqua; E Marubini; F Pozza
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Cytometric and histopathologic features of tumors detected in a randomized mammography screening program: correlation and relative prognostic influence.

Authors:  T Hatschek; O Gröntoft; G Fagerberg; O Stål; S Sullivan; J Carstensen; B Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient value in invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla: is it correlated with prognostic factors?

Authors:  Inanc Guvenc; Sinan Akay; Selami Ince; Ramazan Yildiz; Zafer Kilbas; Fahrettin G Oysul; Mustafa Tasar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Grading invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: advantages of using automated proliferation index instead of mitotic count.

Authors:  Ossama Tawfik; Bruce F Kimler; Marilyn Davis; Christopher Stasik; Sue-Min Lai; Matthew S Mayo; Fang Fan; John K Donahue; Ivan Damjanov; Patricia Thomas; Carol Connor; William R Jewell; Holly Smith; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Adverse prognostic value of peritumoral vascular invasion: is it abrogated by adequate endocrine adjuvant therapy? Results from two International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized trials of chemoendocrine adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  G Viale; A Giobbie-Hurder; B A Gusterson; E Maiorano; M G Mastropasqua; A Sonzogni; E Mallon; M Colleoni; M Castiglione-Gertsch; M M Regan; K N Price; R W Brown; R Golouh; D Crivellari; P Karlsson; C Öhlschlegel; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Prognostic and predictive factors and genetic analysis of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín; Fernando González Palacios; Javier Cortés; Juan de la Haba; José Schneider
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Micrometastases in bone marrow in patients with primary breast cancer: evaluation as an early predictor of bone metastases.

Authors:  J L Mansi; U Berger; D Easton; T McDonnell; W H Redding; J C Gazet; A McKinna; T J Powles; R C Coombes
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-10-31

8.  Prognostic Role of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  M Akrami; A Meshksar; Johari M Ghoddusi; M M Safarpour; S Tahmasebi; V Zangouri; A Talei
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-26

9.  The role of lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with lymph node-positive operable invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Young Ju Song; Sun Hyoung Shin; Jin Seong Cho; Min Ho Park; Jung Han Yoon; Young Jong Jegal
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Body weight and vascular invasion in post-menopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  R A Badwe; I S Fentiman; R R Millis; W M Gregory
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.