Literature DB >> 2196942

Cytometric and histopathologic features of tumors detected in a randomized mammography screening program: correlation and relative prognostic influence.

T Hatschek1, O Gröntoft, G Fagerberg, O Stål, S Sullivan, J Carstensen, B Nordenskjöld.   

Abstract

Cytometric determination of S-phase fraction and ploidy type was performed on 430 tumors detected within a randomized trial of mammographic screening. The results were compared to several histopathologic features. A high S-phase fraction was estimated in tumors with a high grade of malignancy and other histopathologic findings related to rapid tumor progression, including lack of tubule formation, a high mitotic index, marked nuclear pleomorphism, multifocal cancer growth, tumor emboli in lymphatic and blood vessels, tumor necrosis, and inflammatory reaction. DNA aneuploidy was correlated with a high malignancy grade, frequent mitoses, a high degree of nuclear pleomorphism, vascular invasion, necrosis, and the presence of noninvasive ductal carcinoma. Both cytometric variables were inversely related to the degree of elastosis. Positive nodes, large tumor size, DNA aneuploidy, a high S-phase fraction, high grade of malignancy, lack of tubule formation, as well as high mitotic index and pleomorphism, presence of multifocal cancer, and vascular invasion, predicted a significantly shorter distant recurrence-free interval after a median follow-up time of 46.6 months. Elastosis and the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors indicated favorable prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, only lymph node status, tumor size, S-phase fraction, and multifocal growth pattern had independent prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2196942     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  35 in total

1.  The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4).

Authors:  E R Fisher; R M Gregorio; B Fisher; C Redmond; F Vellios; S C Sommers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Results from a randomised study of 92 934 women in a Swedish county.

Authors:  G Fagerberg; L Baldetorp; O Gröntoft; B Lundström; J C Månson; B Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Acta Radiol Oncol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec

3.  A clinical and histopathologic analysis of the results of conservation surgery and radiation therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma.

Authors:  T P Mate; D Carter; D B Fischer; P V Hartman; C McKhann; M Merino; L R Prosnitz; J B Weissberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Association of DNA index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of nodes positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  D W Hedley; C A Rugg; R D Gelber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Correlation of hormone receptors with pathological features in human breast cancer.

Authors:  R R Millis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Nuclear DNA content and prognosis in human breast cancer: a static cytophotometric study.

Authors:  J Harvey; N de Klerk; I Berryman; G Sterrett; M Byrne; J Papadimitriou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Prognostic significance of the DNA content of human breast cancer.

Authors:  C S Dowle; A Owainati; A Robins; K Burns; I O Ellis; C W Elston; R W Blamey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Cytometric characterization and clinical course of breast cancer diagnosed in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  T Hatschek; G Fagerberg; O Stål; S Sullivan; J Carstensen; O Gröntoft; B Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Morphometric analysis of breast carcinoma: association with survival.

Authors:  D M Parham; A J Robertson; R A Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  R Silvestrini; M G Daidone; G Gasparini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of cell cycle parameters in infiltrative ductal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  B Uzarević; M Petrovecki; M Marusić; J Jakić-Razumović; Z Hutinec; A Sabioncello; S Gamulin
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage.

Authors:  P C Stomper; R B Penetrante; S B Edge; M A Arredondo; L E Blumenson; C C Stewart
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.