Literature DB >> 18201494

Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

S Blyth1, A Blakeborough, M Peterson, I C Cameron, A W Majeed.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre-operative MRI scanning of the liver was performed by a single radiologist and the size and number of definite liver metastases were recorded. Patients then underwent hepatectomy with routine intra-operative ultrasonography (IOUS) and resected specimens were sent for histopathology. Pathology findings were compared with those of MRI scans to determine the sensitivity of this imaging modality. Exclusions were patients undergoing hepatic resection more than 4 weeks after the MRI scan, those undergoing chemotherapy at the time of the scan, and those with conglomerate unilobar metastases.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 84 patients. There was total agreement between MRI, IOUS and histology in 79 patients (101 metastases). MRI missed 5 metastases in 5 patients that were found on IOUS (or palpation of superficial lesions) and subsequently confirmed by histological examination. These measured 5 mm or less (4 patients) and 7 mm (one patient). The sensitivity of MRI in the detection of colorectal liver metastases was thus 94% for all lesions and 100% for lesions 1 cm or larger in diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI of the liver is a non-invasive technique with an extremely high degree of sensitivity in the detection of colorectal liver metastases and should be considered as the 'gold standard' in the pre-operative imaging of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18201494      PMCID: PMC2216710          DOI: 10.1308/003588408X242303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  13 in total

1.  Liver metastases: comparison of current MR techniques and spiral CT during arterial portography for detection in 20 surgically staged cases.

Authors:  R C Semelka; W G Cance; H B Marcos; M A Mauro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  J Ward; K S Naik; J A Guthrie; D Wilson; P J Robinson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  [Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases: Gold standard for solitary and radically resectable lesions].

Authors:  J Scheele; A Altendorf-Hofmann; R Stangl; K Schmidt
Journal:  Swiss Surg       Date:  1996

4.  Detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparison of intraoperative US and CT during arterial portography.

Authors:  P Soyer; M Levesque; D Elias; G Zeitoun; A Roche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  S M Beard; M Holmes; C Price; A W Majeed
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of MR and PET imaging for the evaluation of liver metastases.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Diego R Martin; Nevzat Karabulut; Mathis P Frick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The value of intraoperative ultrasound during hepatic resection compared with improved preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rosie Conlon; Michael Jacobs; Dowmitra Dasgupta; J Peter A Lodge
Journal:  Eur J Ultrasound       Date:  2003-02

8.  Preoperative imaging of liver metastases. Comparison of angiography, CT scan, and ultrasonography.

Authors:  P Gunvén; M Makuuchi; K Takayasu; N Moriyama; S Yamasaki; H Hasegawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  The role of chemotherapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  T M Hunt; I Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1989

10.  Solitary hepatic metastasis: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with fat-suppressed T2-weighted, breath-hold T1-weighted FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH sequences.

Authors:  R C Semelka; J P Shoenut; S M Ascher; M A Kroeker; H M Greenberg; C S Yaffe; A B Micflikier
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  14 in total

1.  A Lower-Cost High-Resolution LYSO Detector Development for Positron Emission Mammography (PEM).

Authors:  Rocio A Ramirez; Yuxuan Zhang; Shitao Liu; Hongdi Li; Hossain Baghaei; Shaohui An; Chao Wang; Meei-Ling Jan; Wai-Hoi Wong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 1.679

2.  Prognostic value of incidental hypervascular micronodules detected on cone-beam computed tomography angiography of patients with liver metastasis.

Authors:  Bruno C Odisio; Veronica L Cox; Silvana C Faria; Suguru Yamashita; Xiao Shi; Joe Ensor; Aaron K Jones; Armeen Mahvash; Sanjay Gupta; Alda L Tam; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Ravi Murthy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Imaging diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Ling-Hui Xu; San-Jun Cai; Guo-Xiang Cai; Wei-Jun Peng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Hektor Grazhdani; Cristina Fioravanti; Maria Rosignuolo; Fabrizio Calliada; Daniela Messineo; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Adriano Redler; Carlo Catalano; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Visualisation of liver tumours using hand-held real-time strain imaging: results of animal experiments.

Authors:  D Melodelima; J Chenot; R Souchon; M Rivoire; J-Y Chapelon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Vascular profile characterization of liver tumors by magnetic resonance imaging using hemodynamic response imaging in mice.

Authors:  Yifat Edrei; Eitan Gross; Nathalie Corchia; Galia Tsarfaty; Eithan Galun; Orit Pappo; Rinat Abramovitch
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Targeted imaging of Ewing sarcoma in preclinical models using a 64Cu-labeled anti-CD99 antibody.

Authors:  Allison F O'Neill; Jason L J Dearling; Yuchuan Wang; Tanya Tupper; Yanping Sun; Jon C Aster; Monica L Calicchio; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Alan B Packard; Andrew L Kung
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Non-invasive diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Federica Romano; Laura Pizzuti; Sabrina Segreto; Giovanni Storto; Lorenzo Mannelli; Massimo Imbriaco; Luigi Camera; Simone Maurea
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-28

9.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation.

Authors:  M Scharitzer; A Ba-Ssalamah; H Ringl; C Kölblinger; T Grünberger; M Weber; W Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Current role of intraoperative ultrasonography in hepatectomy.

Authors:  Toshiya Kamiyama; Tatsuhiko Kakisaka; Tatsuya Orimo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.