Literature DB >> 3901864

Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.

D Gatt, C R Quick, M S Owen-Smith.   

Abstract

Skin staples were compared with two conventional suture methods for speed, convenience, effectiveness and cost. One hundred and ninety-five patients having linear abdominal incisions were randomly allocated to one of three methods of interrupted skin closure--polypropylene sutures, polyglactin sutures or stainless steel staples and the wounds were assessed over 30 days. The mean rate of wound closure using sutures was 4.2 cm per minute while staples were faster at 22.5 cm per minute and saved an average of three minutes per wound. The time saved was considerably greater with long incisions. Staples cost 50p more per 15 cm wound than either suture. In other respects the three methods were comparable except that polyglactin caused the least wound pain. We believe the advantages of speed and convenience of skin staples outweigh the extra cost, provided the disposable instruments are reused until empty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3901864      PMCID: PMC2499561     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  2 in total

1.  Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.

Authors:  J Eldrup; U Wied; B Andersen
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1981

2.  Automatic disposable stapling devices for wound closure.

Authors:  A Johnson; G T Rodeheaver; L S Durand; M T Edgerton; R F Edlich
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.721

  2 in total
  20 in total

1.  Half of the currecnt practice of gastrointestinal surgery is against the evidence: a survery of the French Society of Digestive Surgery.

Authors:  Karen Slim; Yves Panis; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A comparative study between Michel and Proximate clips for the closure of neck incisions.

Authors:  A Doble; C L Clark; J S Lumley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.

Authors:  R P Barton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Comparing skin staples to sutures.

Authors:  M Shuster
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Superficial Surgical Site Infection Following the Use of Intracutaneous Sutures Versus Staples.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maurer; Alexander Reuss; Katja Maschuw; Behnaz Aminossadati; Thomas Neubert; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Closure of hip wound, clips or subcuticular sutures: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Bijayendra Singh; M A S Mowbray; G Nunn; S Mearns
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2006-03-23

Review 7.  Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.

Authors:  A Dhanya Mackeen; Vincenzo Berghella; Mie-Louise Larsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

8.  Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.

Authors:  I Stockley; R A Elson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Application of Materials as Medical Devices with Localized Drug Delivery Capabilities for Enhanced Wound Repair.

Authors:  Esther J Lee; Beom Kang Huh; Se Na Kim; Jae Yeon Lee; Chun Gwon Park; Antonios G Mikos; Young Bin Choy
Journal:  Prog Mater Sci       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 10.  Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Debbie Sexton; Charles Mann; Simon Donell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.