Literature DB >> 28755123

Closure of hip wound, clips or subcuticular sutures: does it make a difference?

Bijayendra Singh1,2, M A S Mowbray3, G Nunn4, S Mearns4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate wound healing and complications following surgery for fracture neck of femur. Seventy-one patients were prospectively divided into two groups, according to the method of skin closure: group A had clips; group B had subcuticular vicryl® sutures. There were 41 patients in group A, and 30 patients in group B. There were 13 males and 58 females with an average age of 84.3 years (range 67-100 years). Thirty-seven patients underwent fixation with a dynamic hip screw, while 34 had undergone either a hemi or total hip arthroplasty. The wounds were inspected at days 2, 5, 7, 10 and 14 days, for discharge, redness and infection. There was a statistically significantly greater amount of wound discharge (P<0.002) and redness (P<0.009) in group A (clips) as compared to group B (vicryl). There were three cases of infection; all in patients where clips had been used for skin closure. We concluded that subcuticular vicryl sutures were significantly better than clips in terms of wound healing as well as cost. Except for some decrease in operative time there does not seem to be any advantage in the use of clips for wound closure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clips versus subcuticular vicryl; Discharge; Hip fractures; Inflammation; Wound closure; Wound complication

Year:  2006        PMID: 28755123     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-005-0043-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  14 in total

1.  Staple vs. subcuticular vicryl skin closure in knee replacement surgery: a spectrophotographic assessment of wound characteristics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  James P Southwell-Keely; Robert R Russo; Lyn March; Robert Cumming; Ian Cameron; Alan J M Brnabic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?

Authors:  T Chughtai; L Q Chen; G Salasidis; D Nguyen; C Tchervenkov; J F Morin
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.

Authors:  I Stockley; R A Elson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.

Authors:  J Eldrup; U Wied; B Andersen
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1981

6.  Skin wound closure. The effect of various wound closure methods on susceptibility to infection.

Authors:  R M Stillman; F J Bella; S J Seligman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-05

7.  Automatic disposable stapling devices for wound closure.

Authors:  A Johnson; G T Rodeheaver; L S Durand; M T Edgerton; R F Edlich
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Skin closure after infrainguinal bypass surgery: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  J H Wolterbeek; A A M van Leeuwen; P J Breslau
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Comparative study of skin closure in hip surgery.

Authors:  M Clayer; R T Southwood
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1991-05

10.  The use of taped skin closure in orthopaedic wounds.

Authors:  S M Liew; C S Haw
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1993-02
View more
  13 in total

1.  Do zip-type skin-closing devices show better wound status compared to conventional staple devices in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jae Han Ko; Ick Hwan Yang; Min Seok Ko; Eshnazarov Kamolhuja; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The best cited articles of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST): a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Cyril Mauffrey; Marius M Scarlat; Patrick Simon; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Samo K Fokter; Pierre Kehr
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-14

3.  Staples equal sutures for skin closure after soft tissue tumor resection.

Authors:  David C Moore; Meredith H Sellers; Kristin R Archer; Herbert S Schwartz; Ginger E Holt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence: a literature review.

Authors:  Kylie Sandy-Hodgetts; Keryln Carville; Gavin D Leslie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.

Authors:  Saori Goto; Takashi Sakamoto; Riki Ganeko; Koya Hida; Toshi A Furukawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesse A Shantz; James Vernon; Jeff Leiter; Saam Morshed; Gregory Stranges
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  A US hospital budget impact analysis of a skin closure system compared with standard of care in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kay Sadik; Jana Flener; Jeanine Gargiulo; Zachary Post; Steven Wurzelbacher; Andrew Hogan; Sarah Hollmann; Nicole Ferko
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-12-17

8.  Concealed cosmetic closure in total knee replacement surgery - A prospective audit assessing appearance and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Sanjay Agarwala; Mayank Vijayvargiya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-13

Review 9.  Comparison between Zip-Type Skin Closure Device and Staple for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Tian; Yao-Min Li; Zhi-Jun Li; Gui-Jun Xu; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Complication rate of different wound closures after primary hip arthroplasty - A survey of 373 patients.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Chengqiang Wang; Lijun Lin; Qingsong Qin; Qi Li
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2017-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.