Literature DB >> 3900727

Intramuscular lidocaine for prevention of lethal arrhythmias in the prehospitalization phase of acute myocardial infarction.

R W Koster, A J Dunning.   

Abstract

In a randomized controlled study examining the value of an intramuscular injection of lidocaine in the prehospitalization phase of suspected acute myocardial infarction, paramedics used an automatic injector to administer 400 mg of the drug into the patient's deltoid muscle before transport to the hospital. In a 33-month period, 7026 patients with acute chest pain were seen. Of the 6024 patients randomized (2987 to the lidocaine group and 3037 to the control group), 1935 (32 per cent) proved to have an acute myocardial infarction. In the entire 60-minute period of observation by continuous electrocardiography, primary ventricular fibrillation was observed in 8 treated and 17 control patients (P = 0.08). However, from 15 minutes after randomization onward, when plasma lidocaine levels were in the therapeutic range, only 2 cases of ventricular fibrillation occurred in the treated group, as compared with 12 in the control group (P less than 0.01). Ventricular tachycardia terminated a mean of 10 minutes after injection in six of nine lidocaine-treated patients with acute myocardial infarction but in none of five control patients with infarction (P less than 0.02). Mean plasma lidocaine levels were 3 micrograms per milliliter 11 to 20 minutes after injection in 369 consecutive patients. In 65 patients, levels were below 2 micrograms per milliliter, and in 15 patients, levels were above 6 micrograms per milliliter. Side effects were rare and did not contribute to mortality. We conclude that intramuscular lidocaine may be useful if given by a paramedic, another person, or the patient himself when acute myocardial infarction is suspected outside the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3900727     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198510313131801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  9 in total

Review 1.  Antiarrhythmic prophylaxis after acute myocardial infarction. Is lidocaine still useful?

Authors:  S Nattel; A Arenal
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Emergency cardiac care: an update.

Authors:  R W Swanson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Assessment and management of cardiovascular urgencies and emergencies: cognitive and technical considerations.

Authors:  D E Becker
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use.

Authors:  R W Campbell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Prophylactic lidocaine for postoperative coronary artery bypass patients, a double-blind, randomized trial.

Authors:  F G King; A M Addetia; S D Peters; G O Peachey
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  The pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S Nattel; G Gagne; M Pineau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetic based adjustment of lidocaine antiarrhythmic schedule.

Authors:  V Voicu; C Mircioiu; M Jinga; M Ionescu; X Burcea; D D Ionescu; G Lupescu
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 8.  Arrhythmia prophylaxis after acute myocardial infarction: a decade of controversy.

Authors:  D C Harrison
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Daniel Simancas-Racines; Vidhu Anand; Shrikant Bangdiwala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.