Literature DB >> 2488092

Arrhythmia prophylaxis after acute myocardial infarction: a decade of controversy.

D C Harrison1.   

Abstract

Primary ventricular fibrillation continues to be a major complication of acute myocardial infarction occurring in 5-9% of patients in the coronary care unit and in a higher percentage of pre-hospital admissions. Prophylactic anti-arrhythmic drugs can prevent primary ventricular fibrillation. Lidocaine has been used for this purpose and can be administered safely and effectively in most patients by following well-established programs based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The in-hospital mortality for patients with primary ventricular fibrillation exceeds that of matched controls not having the arrhythmia, and many studies show a higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality. Other studies have failed to confirm these long-term results and have produced controversy among cardiologists. I continue to recommend prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs for all patients with acute infarction, especially in those undergoing early interventional therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2488092     DOI: 10.1007/bf00133208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  40 in total

1.  SURVIVAL AFTER RESUSCITATION FROM CARDIAC ARREST IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.

Authors:  J S ROBINSON; G SLOMAN; T H MATHEW; A J GOBLE
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Pharmacokinetic approach to the clinical use of lidocaine intravenously.

Authors:  D J Greenblatt; V Bolognini; J Koch-Weser; J S Harmatz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-07-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluation of lidocaine resistance in man using intermittent large-dose infusion techniques.

Authors:  E L Alderman; R E Kerber; D C Harrison
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Beta-blocker effectiveness post infarction: an antiarrhythmic or antiischemic effect.

Authors:  A Hjalmarson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Trends in physician management of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1987.

Authors:  M A Hlatky; H E Cotugno; D B Mark; C O'Connor; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G S Wagner
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  Reappraisal of lignocaine therapy in management of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B L Pentecost; J V De Giovanni; P Lamb; P J Cadigan; K L Evemy; E J Flint
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-01

8.  Prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy of high-risk survivors of myocardial infarction: lower mortality at 1 month but not at 1 year.

Authors:  S H Gottlieb; S C Achuff; E D Mellits; G Gerstenblith; K L Baughman; L Becker; N C Chandra; S Henley; J O Humphries; C Heck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Systemic versus intracoronary streptokinase infusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Schröder
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  A prospective trial of intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (I.S.A.M.). Mortality, morbidity, and infarct size at 21 days.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Daniel Simancas-Racines; Vidhu Anand; Shrikant Bangdiwala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.