Literature DB >> 3888819

A narrowband pulse-echo technique for in vivo ultrasonic attenuation estimation.

J Ophir, R E McWhirt, N F Maklad, P M Jaeger.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3888819     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1985.325530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Effect of intervening tissues on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of bone: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Eenas A Omari; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen; Gary Frank
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Anne R Wilson; Matthew J Gilbert; Mark E Sellers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Timothy J Hall; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Backscatter-difference Measurements of Cancellous Bone Using an Ultrasonic Imaging System.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Morgan R Smathers; Catherine J Miller; Joseph A McPherson; Cameron R Thurston; P Luke Spinolo; Sang-Rok Lee
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 6.  Basic concept and clinical applications of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technologies.

Authors:  Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.