Literature DB >> 3875579

Changes in nuclease sensitivity of mammalian cells after irradiation with 60Co gamma-rays.

K Takahashi, I Kaneko.   

Abstract

Changes in sensitivity of mouse BALB/c 3T3 cells in the plateau phase to digestion with micrococcal nuclease were examined following gamma-irradiation. Immediately after irradiation, cell nuclei were more sensitive to micrococcal nuclease compared to unirradiated nuclei. However, there were no detectable changes in length of basic repeating subunits of 182 base pairs of DNA, which include the nucleosome cores consisting of approximately 140 base pairs of DNA, which When the cells were incubated at 37 degrees following irradiation, the sensitivity of cell nuclei to the nuclease first increased then decreased, reaching a similar level to unirradiated nuclei 6 h after irradiation. Both the initial increase and the subsequent decrease in sensitivity of nuclei to micrococcal nuclease were prevented when 15 microM novobiocin was present during the post-irradiation incubation, suggesting a possible involvement of type II DNA topoisomerase in repair of DNA lesions induced by gamma-rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3875579     DOI: 10.1080/09553008514551391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med        ISSN: 0020-7616


  12 in total

1.  Chromatin stiffening underlies enhanced locus mobility after DNA damage in budding yeast.

Authors:  Sébastien Herbert; Alice Brion; Jean-Michel Arbona; Mickaël Lelek; Adeline Veillet; Benoît Lelandais; Jyotsana Parmar; Fabiola García Fernández; Etienne Almayrac; Yasmine Khalil; Eleonore Birgy; Emmanuelle Fabre; Christophe Zimmer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Study of chromatin structure in ataxia-telangiectasia cells.

Authors:  J Houldsworth; S Kumar; M F Lavin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  MTA family of proteins in DNA damage response: mechanistic insights and potential applications.

Authors:  Da-Qiang Li; Yinlong Yang; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Monitoring DNA breaks in optically highlighted chromatin in living cells by laser scanning confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Michael J Kruhlak; Arkady Celeste; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

5.  Cytometric detection of chromatin relaxation, an early reporter of DNA damage response.

Authors:  H Dorota Halicka; Hong Zhao; Monika Podhorecka; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  The complexity of phosphorylated H2AX foci formation and DNA repair assembly at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Asako J Nakamura; V Ashutosh Rao; Yves Pommier; William M Bonner
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Global chromatin fibre compaction in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Charlotte Hamilton; Richard L Hayward; Nick Gilbert
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in the DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Hannes Lans; Jurgen A Marteijn; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 4.954

9.  Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Matilde Murga; Isabel Jaco; Yuhong Fan; Rebeca Soria; Barbara Martinez-Pastor; Myriam Cuadrado; Seung-Min Yang; Maria A Blasco; Arthur I Skoultchi; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  p53 promotes repair of heterochromatin DNA by regulating JMJD2b and SUV39H1 expression.

Authors:  H Zheng; L Chen; W J Pledger; J Fang; J Chen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.