Literature DB >> 3872874

Performance comparison of parameter estimation techniques for the quantitation of local cerebral blood flow by dynamic positron computed tomography.

R A Koeppe, J E Holden, W R Ip.   

Abstract

Local CBF (LCBF) can be quantitated from positron computed tomographic (PCT) data and physiologically based mathematical models by several general methods. Those using a dynamic sequence of PCT scans allow the simultaneous estimation of both LCBF and p, the indicator's tissue-blood partition coefficient. This article presents a comparison of three rapid estimation techniques for use with inert diffusible radioindicators and serial PCT, each of which is based on the original Kety model. One method, developed in our laboratory, involves minimizing the mean squared discrepancy between measured data and model predictions, whereas the other two methods, recently reported in the literature, are weighted integration techniques that involve multiplying the measured data by time-dependent weighting functions. Simulation studies of noise propagation and other sources of error were performed under a variety of simulated conditions. Functional images of LCBF and p were calculated using each method for both phantom and human subject data. Errors can differ by as much as a factor of 2-3 between methods, with each having its own unique advantages and disadvantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3872874     DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  22 in total

1.  Measurement of cerebral blood flow with a bolus of oxygen-15-labelled water: comparison of dynamic and integral methods.

Authors:  A Bol; P Vanmelckenbeke; C Michel; M Cogneau; A M Goffinet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

2.  Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: closing the "mind's eye".

Authors:  R Kawashima; B T O'Sullivan; P E Roland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Visual form discrimination from texture cues: a PET study.

Authors:  B Gulyás; A Cowey; C A Heywood; D Popplewell; P E Roland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial blood flow with thallium-201 and SPECT.

Authors:  H Iida; S Eberl
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Fully parametric imaging with reversible tracer 18F-FLT within a reasonable time.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kudomi; Yukito Maeda; Tetsuhiro Hatakeyama; Yuka Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-07-05

7.  Effect of tissue heterogeneity on quantification in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  G Blomqvist; A A Lammertsma; B Mazoyer; K Wienhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-07

8.  Rapid measurement of regional cerebral blood flow in the baboon using 15O-labelled water and dynamic positron emission tomography.

Authors:  E Pinard; B Mazoyer; B Verrey; S Pappata; C Crouzel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Parametric renal blood flow imaging using [15O]H2O and PET.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kudomi; Niina Koivuviita; Kaisa E Liukko; Vesa J Oikonen; Tuula Tolvanen; Hidehiro Iida; Risto Tertti; Kaj Metsärinne; Patricia Iozzo; Pirjo Nuutila
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The effect of EC-IC bypass surgery on resting cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve capacity studied with stable XE-CT and acetazolamide test.

Authors:  T Yamashita; S Kashiwagi; S Nakano; T Takasago; S Abiko; Y Shiroyama; M Hayashi; H Ito
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.