Literature DB >> 3871321

Evaluation of the Proximate-ILS circular stapler. A prospective study.

V W Fazio, D G Jagelman, I C Lavery, B A McGonagle.   

Abstract

In a prospective open study of the Proximate ILS circular stapler, the results of 125 intestinal anastomoses in 119 patients were reviewed. Intraoperative leakage was observed in five instances, after intraluminal povidone instillation, necessitating suture-line reinforcement. In three instances, incomplete tissue rings (donuts) were found. Temporary fecal diversion was used in seven of 84 patients with anastomoses made to the rectum or anal canal. Roentgenographic assessment of 79 of these anastomoses using Gastrografin demonstrated a leak in three (3.8%). There was one clinical leak (0.9%) in the series. Three patients died (2.5%), none from anastomotic complications. Transient anastomotic strictures were found in three of 82 operative survivors where the anastomosis was within range of the proctoscope. There were no instances of significant hemorrhage from the anastomosis. No patient required anastomotic revision, and of the 51 survivors of cancer surgery where proctoscopy could evaluate the anastomosis, there was no evidence of local recurrence in the period of follow up (mean 16.3 months). The authors conclude: that the Proximate ILS is a safe, reliable and effective instrument for construction of intestinal anastomoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3871321      PMCID: PMC1250626     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Complications of rectal anastomoses with end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapling instrument. Clinical and radiological leak rates and some practical hints.

Authors:  N J Dorricott; R M Baddeley; M R Keighley; J Lee; G D Oates; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Integrity of low colorectal EEA-Stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  W O Kirwan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The low stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  R J Heald; R J Leicester
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument.

Authors:  P Kirkegaard; J Christiansen; A Hjortrup
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Colorectal anastomosis: factors influencing success.

Authors:  R E Tagart
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 18.000

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum.

Authors:  A Berger; E Tiret; R Parc; P Frileux; L Hannoun; B Nordlinger; R Ratelle; R Simon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Curved cutter stapler vs. linear stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a pilot prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Woo Yong Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun; Seong Hyeon Yun; Yong Beom Cho; Hae-Ran Yun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations.

Authors:  F D Griffen; C D Knight; J M Whitaker; C D Knight
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Morbidity and mortality after elective resections of colorectal cancers].

Authors:  B Böhm; K Nouchirvani; H P Hucke; W Stock
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

5.  Prospective trial evaluating new circular and linear stapler devices for gastrointestinal anastomosis: preliminary data.

Authors:  P De Nardi; F Panzeri; C Staudacher
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.