Literature DB >> 19641928

Curved cutter stapler vs. linear stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a pilot prospective randomized study.

Won-Suk Lee1, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun, Seong Hyeon Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Hae-Ran Yun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the safety and technical accessibility of linear stapler and curved cutter stapler (CCS) during mid to low rectal cancer surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April and November 2006, 60 patients were randomly assigned to either linear staplers (DST TA; United States Surgical, Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Norwalk, CT) or the CCS (Contour Curved Cutter Stapler(R); Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) during low anterior resection for mid to low rectal cancers.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, and mean carcinoembryonic antigen level between the two groups. Distal resection margin was longer in the CCS group as compared with the linear stapler group but did not reach statistical significance (24.7 vs. 20.8 mm, P = 0.065). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: In this study, both the CCS and linear staplers were satisfactory devices for securing the distal rectum during low anterior resection in mid to low rectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641928     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0771-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

Review 1.  The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler.

Authors:  C D Knight; F D Griffen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Prospective randomized comparison of linear staplers during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  J Kenneth Champion; Michael D Williams
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Evaluation of the Proximate-ILS circular stapler. A prospective study.

Authors:  V W Fazio; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; B A McGonagle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  S L Blamey; P W Lee
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Double stapling technique for low anterior resection.

Authors:  Z Cohen; E Myers; B Langer; B Taylor; R H Railton; C Jamieson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: The state of the art.

Authors:  Carlo Staudacher; Andrea Vignali
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-27

2.  Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Alper Sozutek; Tahsin Colak; Ahmet Dag; Tolga Olmez
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Association of Complications with Healthcare Utilization and Hospital-Borne Costs Among Patients Undergoing Open Low Anterior Resection Using Curved Cutter Staplers.

Authors:  Pragya Rai; Stephen S Johnston; Rusha Chaudhuri; Elena Naoumtchik; Esther Pollack
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-03-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.