Literature DB >> 3870857

Tempo and mode of concerted evolution in the L1 repeat family of mice.

S L Martin1, C F Voliva, S C Hardies, M H Edgell, C A Hutchison.   

Abstract

A 300-bp DNA sequence has been determined for 30 (10 from each of three species of mice) random isolates of a subset of the long interspersed repeat family L1. From these data we conclude that members of the L1 family are evolving in concert at the DNA sequence level in Mus domesticus, Mus caroli, and Mus platythrix. The mechanism responsible for this phenomenon may be either duplicative transposition, gene conversion, or a combination of the two. The amount of intraspecies divergence averages 4.4%, although between species base substitutions accumulate at the rate of approximately 0.85%/Myr to a maximum divergence of 9.1% between M. platythrix and both M. domesticus and M. caroli. Parsimony analysis reveals that the M. platythrix L1 family has evolved into a distinct clade in the 10-12 Myr since M. platythrix last shared a common ancestor with M. domesticus and M. caroli. The parsimony tree also provides a means to derive the average half-life of L1 sequences in the genome. The rates of gain and loss of individual copies of L1 were estimated to be approximately equal, such that approximately one-half of them turn over every 3.3 Myr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3870857     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  37 in total

1.  A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells.

Authors:  A Tremblay; M Jasin; P Chartrand
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The end of the LINE?: lack of recent L1 activity in a group of South American rodents.

Authors:  N C Casavant; L Scott; M A Cantrell; L E Wiggins; R J Baker; H A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Identification of transcriptional regulatory activity within the 5' A-type monomer sequence of the mouse LINE-1 retroposon.

Authors:  D M Severynse; C A Hutchison; M H Edgell
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  The evolution of coexisting highly divergent LINE-1 subfamilies within the rodent genus Peromyscus.

Authors:  D H Kass; F G Berger; W D Dawson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Dispersed repetitive elements in mouse genome analysis.

Authors:  G E Herman; J H Nadeau; S C Hardies
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Rapid evolution of a young L1 (LINE-1) clade in recently speciated Rattus taxa.

Authors:  E L Cabot; B Angeletti; K Usdin; A V Furano
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Molecular evolution and tempo of amplification of human LINE-1 retrotransposons since the origin of primates.

Authors:  Hameed Khan; Arian Smit; Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The frequency and structure of recombinant products is determined by the cellular level of MutL.

Authors:  Marina Elez; Miroslav Radman; Ivan Matic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  PiRNA-like RNAs in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica identify transcription clusters and likely marsupial transposon targets.

Authors:  Eric J Devor; Lingyan Huang; Paul B Samollow
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Copia-like retrotransposable element evolution in diploid and polyploid cotton (Gossypium L.).

Authors:  P L VanderWiel; D F Voytas; J F Wendel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.