Literature DB >> 387019

Cephaloridine prophylaxis in resection of the large intestine.

E S Hughes, F T McDermott, A White, J P Masterton.   

Abstract

A controlled prospective clinical trial of cephaloridine chemoprophylaxis in resection of the large intestine was undertaken between 1974 and 1978. Data were available on 159 of 177 unselected patients. All were operated on by one surgeon. Three groups were studied: intraabdominal resection and anastomosis (102 patients); pullthrough resection and anastomosis (30 patients): and resection, with colostomy or ileostomy, without anastomosis (27 patients). In the total patient series cephaloridine reduced wound infection from 38.3% to 15.4% (P less than 0.003). There was no significant decrease in intraabdominal infection. In the group of patients undergoing intraabdominal resection and anastomosis the would infection rate was reduced from 40.0% to 14.9% (P less than 0.01). Cephaloridine reduced wound infection from 50.0% to 21.4% (P = 0.05) in those patients in whom drainage tubes were inserted. A decrease in the incidence of faecal fistula from 10.9% to 4.3% was not significant. Wound infections were not reduced significantly after pullthrough excisions or resections without anastomosis. The results support the routine prophylactic use of cephalosporins in patients undergoing intraabdominal resection of the large intestine with anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 387019     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1979.tb05834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  8 in total

1.  Prophylaxis of infection following colorectal surgery.

Authors:  N Rangabashyam; A Rathnasami
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Cefotaxime i.v. versus oral neomycin-erythromycin for prophylaxis of infections after colorectal operations.

Authors:  D Raahave; P Hesselfeldt; T B Pedersen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Experimental animal model of surgical wound infection applicable to antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  F Moesgaard; M C Lykkegaard Nielsen; T Justesen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Sepsis and asepsis in large bowel cancer surgery.

Authors:  E S Hughes; F T McDermott; A L Polglase; W R Johnson; E A Pihl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Wound infection rates after intraincisional plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in an animal model.

Authors:  F Moesgaard; M C Lykkegaard Nielsen; T Justesen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Wound infection rates following preoperative versus intraoperative commencement of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  F Moesgaard; M C Lykkegaard Nielsen; T Justesen; J H Scheibel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Neutrophil priming as a risk factor for surgical site infection in patients with colon cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Yuji Toiyama; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Tadanobu Shimura; Shozo Ide; Hiromi Yasuda; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Yoshiki Okita; Takeshi Yokoe; Junichiro Hiro; Masaki Ohi; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  International survey among surgeons on laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the gap between guidelines and reality.

Authors:  Mahdi Al-Taher; Nariaki Okamoto; Didier Mutter; Laurents P S Stassen; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana; Bernard Dallemagne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.