Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape.

Literature DB >> 3865899

The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape.

K C Lim, J Webber.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 1985 PMID： 3865899 DOI： 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00450.x

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Endod J ISSN： 0143-2885 Impact factor: 5.264

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

20 in total

1. Simulated root canals preparation time, comparing ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems, performed by an undergraduate student.

Authors: Inês Conceição; Inês Ferreira; Ana-Cristina Braga; Irene Pina-Vaz
Journal: J Clin Exp Dent Date: 2020-08-01

2. Shaping Ability of Reciproc, UnicOne, and Protaper Universal in Simulated Root Canals.

Authors: Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho; Cláudia de Castro Rizzi; Matheus Bandeca Coelho; Sara Freitas Santos; Luzia Mayanne Oliveira Costa; Ceci Nunes Carvalho; Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Janir Alves Soares
Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2015-04-09

3. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.

Authors: Hui Wu; Cheng Peng; Yulong Bai; Xin Hu; Lei Wang; Changyi Li
Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 2.757

4. Influence of Operator's Experience on the Shaping Ability of Protaper Universal and Waveone Systems: A Comparative Study on Simulated Root Canals.

Authors: Giuseppe Troiano; Mario Dioguardi; Armando Cocco; Giovanni Giannatempo; Luigi Laino; Domenico Ciavarella; Elio Berutti; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal: Open Dent J Date: 2016-10-07

5. A comparison of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study via a contrast radiopaque technique in vitro.

Authors: Zhao Wei; Zhi Cui; Ping Yan; Han Jiang
Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 2.757

6. Comparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals.

Authors: Maryam Forghani; Maryam Hezarjaribi; Hamidreza Teimouri
Journal: J Clin Exp Dent Date: 2017-04-01

The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape.

1. Simulated root canals preparation time, comparing ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems, performed by an undergraduate student.

2. Shaping Ability of Reciproc, UnicOne, and Protaper Universal in Simulated Root Canals.

3. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.

4. Influence of Operator's Experience on the Shaping Ability of Protaper Universal and Waveone Systems: A Comparative Study on Simulated Root Canals.

5. A comparison of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study via a contrast radiopaque technique in vitro.

6. Comparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals.

7. Effect of number of uses and sterilization on the instrumented area and resistance of reciprocating instruments.

8. Influence of calcium hydroxide points on the quality of intracanal dressing filling.

9. Comparison of extracted teeth and simulated resin blocks on apical canal transportation.

10. Canal transportation and centering ability of twisted file and reciproc: a cone-beam computed tomography assessment.