Literature DB >> 383822

Heterogeneous enzyme immunoassay.

A J O'Beirne, H R Cooper.   

Abstract

During the past 10 to 15 years immunoassays have gained acceptance as the methods of choice in the diagnosis of a number of disease states. At present the immunodiagnostic techniques employed range from radioimmunoassay for haptens through immunofluorescence for autoimmune diseases to complement fixation for viral infections. All of these assays have their own individual limitations such as: safety, short shelf life and sensitivity. The development of enzyme immunoassays, in particular enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), has led to a substantial literature which offers the view that enzyme immunoassays provide a safe, sensitive and specific alternative to standard methods for the detection of antibodies or antigens. The application of heterogeneous enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for the quantitation of haptens, macromolecular antigens and antibodies is reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 383822     DOI: 10.1177/27.8.383822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  15 in total

1.  Detection of West Nile virus antigen in mosquitoes and avian tissues by a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Ann R Hunt; Roy A Hall; Amy J Kerst; Roger S Nasci; Harry M Savage; Nicholas A Panella; Kristy L Gottfried; Kristen L Burkhalter; John T Roehrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Probe colorimeter for quantitating enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and other colorimetric assays performed with microplates.

Authors:  S B Ackerman; E A Kelley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  IgM detection by ELISA in the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infections in homosexual and heterosexual immunosuppressed patients.

Authors:  E Buimovici-Klein; M K Tinker; A J O'Beirne; M Lange; Z Cooper
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.574

4.  Detection of La Crosse arbovirus antigen in mosquito pools: application of chromogenic and fluorogenic enzyme immunoassay systems.

Authors:  S W Hildreth; B J Beaty; J M Meegan; C L Frazier; R E Shope
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multicenter evaluation of a 1-h enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella serology.

Authors:  W L Boteler; K J Barnes; E Buimovici-Klein; A J O'Beirne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Use of single radial haemolysis for assessing antibody response to influenza virus vaccines in animals.

Authors:  T L Smith; R Jennings; C W Potter
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Immunoglobulin M antibodies detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and radioimmunoassay in the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infections in pregnant women and newborn infants.

Authors:  S Stagno; M K Tinker; C Elrod; D A Fuccillo; G Cloud; A J O'Beirne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Monoclonal antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for identification of K99-positive Escherichia coli isolates from calves.

Authors:  K W Mills; K L Tietze
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Monoclonal antibody passive hemagglutination and capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for direct detection and quantitation of F41 and K99 fimbrial antigens in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T J Raybould; C F Crouch; S D Acres
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  BrucELISA: an enzyme-antibody immunoassay for detection of Brucella abortus antibodies in milk: correlation with the Brucella ring test and with shedding of viable organisms.

Authors:  D K Boraker; W R Stinebring; J R Kunkel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.