Literature DB >> 3837109

Mechanical sensitivity of the facial nerve fibers innervating the anterior palate of the puffer, Fugu pardalis, and their central projection to the primary taste center.

S Kiyohara, I Hidaka, J Kitoh, S Yamashita.   

Abstract

Mechanical and chemical sensitivity of the palatine nerve, ramus palatinus facialis, innervating the anterior palate of the puffer, Fugu pardalis, and their central projection to the primary taste center were investigated. Application of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to the central cut end of the palatine nerve resulted in retrogradely labeled neurons in the geniculate ganglion but no such neurons in the trigeminal ganglion, suggesting that the palatine nerve is represented only by the facial component. Tracing of the facial sensory root in serial histological sections of the brain stem suggested that the facial sensory nerve fibers project only to the visceral sensory column of the medulla. Peripheral recordings from the palatine nerve bundle showed that both mechanical and chemical stimuli caused marked responses. Mechanosensitive fibers were rather uniformly distributed in the nerve bundle. Intra-cranial recordings from the trigeminal and facial nerves at their respective roots revealed that tactile information produced in the anterior palate was carried by the facial nerve fibers. Elimination of the sea water current over the receptive field also caused a marked response in the palatine nerve bundle or facial nerve root while this did not cause any detectable responses in the trigeminal nerve root. Single fiber analyses of the mechanical responsiveness of the palatine nerve were performed by recording unit responses of 106 single fibers to mechanical stimuli (water flow), HCl (0.005 M), uridine-5'-monophosphate (UMP, 0.001 M), proline (0.01 M), CaCl2 (0.5 M), and NaSCN (0.5 M). All these fibers responded well to one of the above stimuli; however, most taste fibers did not respond well to the inorganic salts. The palatine fibers (n = 36), identified as mechanosensitive, never responded to any of the chemical stimuli, whereas chemosensitive fibers (n = 70) did not respond to mechanical stimuli at all. The chemosensitive units showed a high specificity to the above stimuli: they tended to respond selectively to hydrochloric acid, UMP, or proline. The responses of the mechanosensitive units consisted of phasic and tonic impulse trains and the sensitivity of the units varied considerably. The results reveal that the facial nerve fibers innervating the anterior palate of the puffer contain two kinds of afferent fibers, chemosensory and mechanosensory respectively, and suggest that the convergence of the tactile and gustatory information first occurs in the neurons of the primary gustatory center in the medulla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3837109     DOI: 10.1007/bf01350069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  29 in total

1.  The ultrastructure of taste and touch receptors of the frog's taste organ.

Authors:  M V Düring; K H Andres
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1976-01-26       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  NEURAL RESPONSE OF CAT TO TASTE STIMULI OF VARYING TEMPERATURES.

Authors:  J NAGAKI; S YAMASHITA; M SATO
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1964-02-15

3.  Tongue mechanoreceptors: comparison of afferent fibers in the lingual nerve and chorda tympani.

Authors:  M A Biedenbach; K Y Chan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Anatomy of the gustatory system in the hamster: central projections of the chorda tympani and the lingual nerve.

Authors:  M C Whitehead; M E Frank
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-11-10       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Central projections of gustatory nerves in the rat.

Authors:  R B Hamilton; R Norgren
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Electrophysiological evidence for the topographical arrangement of taste and tactile neurons in the facial lobe of the channel catfish.

Authors:  T Marui; J Caprio
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-01-07       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Distribution of taste buds on the lips and inside the mouth in a minnow, Pseudorasbora parva.

Authors:  S Kiyohara; S Yamashita; J Kitoh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-06

8.  Cytoarchitecture and topographic projections of the gustatory centers in a teleost, Carassius carassius.

Authors:  Y Morita; T Murakami; H Ito
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-08-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  On the occurrence of Merkel cells in the epidermis of teleost fishes.

Authors:  E B Lane; M Whitear
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1977-08-09       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Comparative study of ultrastructures of the lateral-line organs and the palatal taste organs in the African clawed toad, Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  K Toyoshima; A Shimamura
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1982-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Receptive fields and gustatory responsiveness of frog glossopharyngeal nerve. A single fiber analysis.

Authors:  T Hanamori; K Hirota; N Ishiko
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.