Literature DB >> 2374001

Receptive fields and gustatory responsiveness of frog glossopharyngeal nerve. A single fiber analysis.

T Hanamori1, K Hirota, N Ishiko.   

Abstract

Receptive fields and responsiveness of single fibers of the glossopharyngeal (IXth) nerve were investigated using electrical, gustatory (NaCl, quinine HCl, acetic acid, water, sucrose, and CaCl2), thermal, and mechanical stimulation of the single fungiform papillae distributed on the dorsal tongue surface in frogs. 172 single fibers were isolated. 58% of these fibers (99/172) were responsive to at least one of the gustatory stimuli (taste fibers), and the remaining 42% (73/172) were responsive only to touch (touch fibers). The number of papillae innervated by a single fiber (receptive field) was between 1 and 17 for taste fibers and between 1 and 10 for touch fibers. The mean receptive field of taste fibers (X = 6.6, n = 99) was significantly larger than that of touch fibers (X = 3.6, n = 73) (two-tailed t test, P less than 0.001). In experiments with natural stimulation of single fungiform papillae, it was found that every branch of a single fiber has a similar responsiveness. Taste fibers were classified into 14 types (Type N, Q, A, NA, NCa, NCaA, NCaW, NCaAW, NCaWS, NQ, NQA, NQAS, NQWarm, Multiple) on the basis of their responses to gustatory and thermal stimuli. The time course of the response in taste fibers was found to be characteristic of their types. For example, the fibers belonging to Type NQA showed phasic responses, those in Type NCa showed tonic responses, etc. These results indicate that there are several groups of fibers in the frog IXth nerve and that every branch of an individual fiber has a similar responsiveness to the parent fiber.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2374001      PMCID: PMC2216353          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.95.6.1159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  36 in total

1.  INNERVATION OF THE FUNGIFORM PAPILLAE IN THE FROG TONGUE.

Authors:  G RAPUZZI; C CASELLA
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Synaptic processing of taste-quality information in thalamus of the rat.

Authors:  T R Scott; R P Erickson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Synaptic processing of taste-quality information in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rate.

Authors:  G S Doetsch; R P Erickson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The ultrastructure of frogs' taste organs.

Authors:  P P Graziadei; R S DeHan
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1971

5.  Single unit recordings from the geniculate ganglion of the facial nerve of the cat.

Authors:  J C Boudreau; B E Bradley; P R Bierer; S Kruger; C Tsuchitani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1971-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tongue mechanoreceptors: comparison of afferent fibers in the lingual nerve and chorda tympani.

Authors:  M A Biedenbach; K Y Chan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Interactions between taste receptors in the frog tongue.

Authors:  V Taglietti; C Casella; E Ferrari
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Neural correlates of gustatory intensity and quality.

Authors:  J R Ganchrow; R P Erickson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Peripheral interactions among single papilla inputs to gustatory nerve fibers.

Authors:  I J Miller
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Renewal of cells within taste buds.

Authors:  L M Beidler; R L Smallman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.