Literature DB >> 3832593

Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.

C J Erkelens, H Collewijn.   

Abstract

The dynamic properties of the version and vergence system were studied in relation to stereopsis for movements of the whole visual scene. Large random-dot stereograms (30 X 30 deg arc), moving laterally, were viewed dichoptically by human subjects without a fixed visual frame of reference. Sinusoidal movements in counterphase of the two half-images constituting the stereogram induced sinusoidal ocular vergence movements. The gain of vergence depended on the frequency as well as the amplitude of stimulus movement, while the phase lag depended only on the frequency. Fusion and stereopsis were retained up to a maximal velocity of change in relative position of the two half-images between 6 and 13.5 deg/sec. Sinusoidal movement of one half-image while the other one remained stationary induced sinusoidal ocular version as well as vergence movements. For version gains were higher and phase lags were smaller than for vergence. At the retinal level, residual overall binocular disparities between the two half-images up to 2 deg arc were tolerated without loss of stereopsis. The presence of sinusoidally varying overall binocular disparities and ocular vergence movements without perception of motion in depth suggests that these variables are not adequate cues for perception of (change in) depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3832593     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90141-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Version and vergence eye movements in humans: open-loop dynamics determined by monocular rather than binocular image speed.

Authors:  G S Masson; D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Short-latency ocular following in humans is dependent on absolute (rather than relative) binocular disparity.

Authors:  D-S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Perception can influence the vergence responses associated with open-loop gaze shifts in 3D.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Frederick A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias.

Authors:  D-S Yang; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Vergence-dependent adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Richard A Clendaniel; David S Zee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Bridging the gap: global disparity processing in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Vergence effects on the perception of motion-in-depth.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of diazepam on the latency of saccades for luminance and binocular disparity defined stimuli.

Authors:  Cunguo Wang; Jianliang Tong; Fuchuan Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.