Literature DB >> 3812889

Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

P R O'Connell, J H Pemberton, M L Brown, K A Kelly.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine whether ileal pouch motility and evacuability and the 24 hour fecal output influence stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In 23 patients, at a mean of 24 months postoperatively (range 22 to 26 months), ileal pouch motility was measured using an intraluminal bag and pressure-sensitive catheters. The pattern and efficiency of ileal pouch emptying was determined scintigraphically. A 24 hour stool collection was made and the stool output and stool frequency recorded. The volume of ileal pouch distention at which large amplitude propulsive waves appeared (the threshold volume) correlated closely with stool frequency. The larger the threshold volume, the fewer the stools per 24 hours (correlation coefficient -0.70; p less than 0.01). Also, the greater the 24 hour stool output, the greater the stool frequency (correlation coefficient 0.79, p less than 0.001). In contrast, the efficiency of ileal pouch evacuation was less strongly related to stool frequency (correlation coefficient -0.41, p = 0.05). We conclude that ileal pouch motility and stool output are major determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Inefficient pouch emptying is less commonly associated with frequent bowel movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3812889     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90807-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  26 in total

1.  Key factors influencing bowel function after ileal W-pouch anal anastomosis: a spectral analysis of W-pouch motor activity.

Authors:  T Maruta; S Homma; M Yagi; J Hasegawa; K Shimamura; T Suda; Y Sakai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of ileoanal pouch and rectal function measured by barostat.

Authors:  J Steens; C Penning; W A Bemelman; G Griffioen; R A Van Hogezand; W J Meijerink; C B Lamers; A A Masclee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis: the implications of pouchitis.

Authors:  B J Fozard; J H Pemberton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the Irish experience. Irish Association of Coloproctology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Determinants of ileoanal pouch function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; A A Lewis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Clinical and physiological study of anal sphincter and ileal J pouch before preileostomy closure and 6 and 12 months after closure of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  S Chaussade; S Michopoulos; M Hautefeuille; P Valleur; P Hautefeuille; J Guerre; D Couturier
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch.

Authors:  K Maeda; M Hashimoto; J Koh; O Yamamoto; Y Hosoda; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Scintigraphic comparison of neorectal emptying between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis after stapled low anterior resection.

Authors:  Yoshitake Sugamata; Yasuo Takase; Masatoshi Oya
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.