Literature DB >> 3800143

Oropharyngeal deposition and delivery aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols.

C S Kim, M A Eldridge, M A Sackner.   

Abstract

Oropharyngeal deposition and subsequent delivery of metered-dose inhaler (MDI) aerosols into the lung were measured with the actuator alone and with 4 different kinds of auxiliary devices; open-end straight tube, Aerochamber, Nebuhaler, and InspirEase. The total mass of dry aerosol discharged directly from the actuator, from the auxiliary devices, and through the oropharyngeal model was determined by collecting the aerosol on the absolute filter and weighing the filter. Aerosol depositions in the auxiliary devices and in the oropharynx as well as the amount of aerosol delivered past the oropharynx were determined as percentages of the total aerosol mass output from the actuator alone. Six different MDI aerosols, 3 bronchodilators, and 3 corticosteroids were used. With the actuator alone, oropharyngeal deposition ranged from 33 to 71% at an inspiratory flow rate of 0.33 L/s, depending on the type of MDI aerosols. Aerosol delivery into the lung was 29 to 67%. With the auxiliary devices, oropharyngeal deposition markedly decreased to the range below 6% regardless of the type of auxiliary device and aerosol. A major deposition (23 to 72%) occurred in the auxiliary devices except for Nebuhaler in which a much reduced deposition (8 to 18%) occurred. Aerosol delivery into the lung was in the range of 40 to 72% with the open-end tube, 26 to 62% with the Aerochamber, 34 to 60% with InspirEase, and 31 to 92% with Nebuhaler. Although a substantial increase in aerosol delivery (as much as 38%) was found with a large size Nebuhaler, the aerosol delivery with other smaller auxiliary devices used was comparable to those obtained without the auxiliary devices.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3800143     DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.1.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  9 in total

1.  Effect of oropharyngeal length in drug lung delivery via suspension pressurized metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  T Ehtezazi; D R Allanson; I D Jenkinson; C O'Callaghan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A cascade impactor entry port for MDI sprays with collection characteristics imitating a physical model of the human throat.

Authors:  N C Miller; A M Purrington
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Effect of electrostatic charge, flow, delay and multiple actuations on the in vitro delivery of salbutamol from different small volume spacers for infants.

Authors:  J H Wildhaber; S G Devadason; E Eber; M J Hayden; M L Everard; Q A Summers; P N LeSouëf
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Treatment with isoproterenol of bupivacaine toxicity.

Authors:  P Lacombe; G Blaise; F Plante; C Hollmann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Pressure flow characteristics of the valve in spacer devices.

Authors:  F H Sennhauser; P D Sly
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Inhaled beta-2 agonists and steroids. Present state and future perspectives.

Authors:  A M Clauzel
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1994

Review 7.  Inhalation devices for asthma. Choosing the right one could make all the difference.

Authors:  P M Fong; D E Sinclair
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Management of asthma in young children.

Authors:  Marianna Sockrider
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Inhalational drug delivery from seven different spacer devices.

Authors:  P W Barry; C O'Callaghan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.139

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.