Literature DB >> 4017203

Programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of an acute myocardial infarction.

D Roy, E Marchand, P Théroux, D D Waters, G B Pelletier, M G Bourassa.   

Abstract

The prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation and its usefulness in relation to other forms of invasive and noninvasive testing was evaluated in 150 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias of 6 beats or more were induced in 35 (23%) patients. No significant differences existed between patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias and those without inducible ventricular tachycardia with respect to occurrence of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in the acute and early recovery phase of infarction or predischarge exercise-induced ischemia or arrhythmias, severity of coronary artery disease, or degree of left ventricular dysfunction. A higher incidence of inferior myocardial infarction was observed in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia when compared with those without inducible ventricular tachycardia (66% vs 41%, p less than .01). During a mean follow-up of 10 +/- 5 months (range 2 to 19), there were two sudden deaths, three nonsudden deaths, and two additional patients developed sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. There was no significant difference between patients with and those without inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias with respect to the occurrence of these events. In this study population, a lower mean ejection fraction (p less than .01), the presence of a ventricular aneurysm (p less than .05), and exercise-induced ventricular premature contractions (p less than .05) were predictors of sudden death and of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia. Thus, the findings of this study do not support the hypothesis that the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction identifies a group at high risk for sudden cardiac death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4017203     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.72.3.487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification - An Update.

Authors:  Reginald Liew
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A K Bhandari; R Hong; A Kotlewski; N McIntosh; P Au; A Sankoorikal; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-05

3.  Sudden death prediction by programmed electrical stimulation following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Kron; C K Li; E Murphy; D Broudy; C Morris; K Griffith; J H McAnulty
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1986-11

4.  [Holter monitoring and programmed ventricular stimulation].

Authors:  B D Gonska
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

Review 5.  Noninvasive risk stratification after myocardial infarction: rationale, current evidence and the need for definitive trials.

Authors:  Derek Exner
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 6.  Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  An H Bui; Jonathan W Waks
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-02-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.