Literature DB >> 3795887

Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

L E Humes, D D Dirks, T S Bell, C Ahlstrom, G E Kincaid.   

Abstract

The present article is divided into four major sections dealing with the application of acoustical indices to the prediction of speech recognition performance. In the first section, two acoustical indices, the Articulation Index (AI) and the Speech Transmission Index (STI), are described. In the next section, the effectiveness of the AI and the STI in describing the performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects listening to spectrally distorted (filtered) and temporarily distorted (reverberant) speech is examined retrospectively. In the third section, the results of a prospective investigation that examined the recognition of nonsense syllables under conditions of babble competition, filtering and reverberation are described. Finally, in the fourth section, the ability of the acoustical indices to describe the performance of 10 hearing-impaired listeners, 5 listening in quiet and 5 in babble, is examined. It is concluded that both the AI and the STI have significant shortcomings. A hybrid index, designated mSTI, which takes the best features from each procedure, is described and demonstrated to be the best alternative presently available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3795887     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2904.447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  10 in total

1.  The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.

Authors:  Riya Singh; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of audibility and novel word learning ability on vocabulary level in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

3.  Financial worry and psychological distress among cancer survivors in the United States, 2013-2018.

Authors:  Edward Christopher Dee; Ryan D Nipp; Vinayak Muralidhar; Zizi Yu; Santino S Butler; Brandon A Mahal; Paul L Nguyen; Nina N Sanford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

6.  Auditory System Development and Dysfunction: What Do We Really Know about Childhood Hearing Loss?

Authors:  A E Carney
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

7.  Cortical adaptation to sound reverberation.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; Kerry M M Walker; Nicol S Harper; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Andrew J King
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.

Authors:  Noël Y Dwyer; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Use of an adaptive-bandwidth protocol to measure importance functions for simulated cochlear implant frequency channels.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.