Literature DB >> 1839577

Tract formation following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in an animal model.

J D Mellinger1, I B Simon, B Schlechter, R H Lash, J L Ponsky.   

Abstract

Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) have often been related to the application of excessive traction to the gastrostomy tube in an attempt to achieve immediate juxtaposition of the gastric and abdominal walls. Recent clinical reviews have suggested that complication rates can be reduced by avoiding such traction and leaving a longer tract between these structures. Laboratory evaluation of tract development has been lacking. The present study was designed to evaluate tract formation in an animal model. Eight mongrel dogs underwent PEG placement using silastic (n = 4) or latex (n = 4) catheters. Two animals from each group were subsequently sacrificed at 1 week and the remaining animals, at 2 weeks. In each animal, 6 cm catheter length was left between the gastric and the abdominal walls. This distance was assured by crossbar and suture fixation of the catheter at the skin entry site. Complete tract formation was evident in all animals at the time they were sacrificed, with no significant gross or histologic differences being noted between the silastic and the latex groups. Increased collagen deposition was noted at 2 weeks in comparison with that observed at 1 week. In an additional three animals, the same procedure was performed, but the catheter was not secured to the abdominal wall at the site of skin penetration. In these animals, tract formation was incomplete as late as at 2 weeks, but there were no associated complications. We conclude that early PEG tract formation is not dependent on the immediate proximity of the gastric and abdominal walls. The type of catheter used does not dictate the time course of early tract development.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1839577     DOI: 10.1007/bf02653261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  Colocutaneous fistula following migration of PEG tube.

Authors:  S A Berger; E J Zarling
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Pathogenesis of complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A lesson in surgical principles.

Authors:  R S Chung; M Schertzer
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Prolapse of gastrostomy tube resulting in entero-enteric fistula and intussusception.

Authors:  W Tom; K Zachary; G Fruchter; V Simko
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Operative versus endoscopic gastrostomy. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  G Stiegmann; J Goff; C VanWay; L Perino; N Pearlman; L Norton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy.

Authors:  J L Ponsky; M W Gauderer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Percutaneous approaches to enteral alimentation.

Authors:  J L Ponsky; M W Gauderer; T A Stellato; A Aszodi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D E Larson; D D Burton; K W Schroeder; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with surgical gastrostomy at a community hospital.

Authors:  J S Stern
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Fatal and disastrous complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  J A Ditesheim; W Richards; K Sharp
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  8 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with T-fasteners obviates the need for emergent replacement after early tube dislodgement.

Authors:  P Timratana; K El-Hayek; H Shimizu; M Kroh; B Chand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Semiurgent endoscopic PEG tube replacement as a treatment for early initial PEG tube dislodgement in the immune-compromised patient.

Authors:  David I Gaines; Mark H Delegge
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The Development of PEG: How it was.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04

4.  Intraabdominal mesh prosthesis in a canine model.

Authors:  B Schlechter; J Marks; R B Shillingstad; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Buried bumper syndrome: A complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Jiri Cyrany; Stanislav Rejchrt; Marcela Kopacova; Jan Bures
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  PEG "Rescue": a practical NOTES technique.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Marks; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jonathan P Pearl; Michael F McGee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  T-fastener migration after percutaneous gastropexy for transgastric enteral tube insertion.

Authors:  Ryan H Sydnor; Stacey M Schriber; Charles Yoon Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Buried bumper syndrome: a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kurek; Andrzej Baniukiewicz; Agnieszka Świdnicka-Siergiejko
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.