Literature DB >> 8439760

Renal streak artifact during contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of low versus high osmolality contrast media.

S K Sussman1, F F Illescas, J P Opalacz, P Yirga, L C Foley.   

Abstract

Two hundred abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans in 200 patients, 100 performed with low osmolality contrast (ioversol 68%, 100 ml) and 100 performed with high osmolality contrast (diatrizoate meglumine 60%, 150 ml), were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of renal streak artifact. Contrast was administered by hand injection at a rate of approximately 1-2 ml/s and sequential scanning was employed. Of the scans performed with high osmolality contrast, 70% had no artifact, 28% had minimal artifact, and only 2% had marked artifact. Only 26% of the exams performed with low osmolality contrast were artifact-free, whereas 53% demonstrated minimal artifact and 21% demonstrated marked artifact. The likelihood of encountering renal streak artifact when using low osmolality contrast agents is almost seven times greater than when high osmolality contrast agents are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8439760     DOI: 10.1007/bf00198059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  13 in total

Review 1.  The small (less than or equal to 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies.

Authors:  M A Bosniak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.

Authors:  M E Bernardino; E K Fishman; R B Jeffrey; P C Brown
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Low-osmolality contrast media: premises and promises.

Authors:  B L McClennan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Clinical intravenous urography: comparative trial of ioxaglate and iopamidol.

Authors:  C F Loughran
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Urographic excretion studies with nonionic contrast agents. Iopamidol vs. iothalamate.

Authors:  J Wilcox; C A Evill; M R Sage; G T Benness
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Urography with low-osmolality contrast media: comparative urinary excretion of Iopamidol, Hexabrix, and diatrizoate.

Authors:  R F Spataro; H W Fischer; L Boylan
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Evaluation of lopamidol and diatrizoate in excretory urography: a double-blind clinical study.

Authors:  S T Cochran; J W Ballard; R W Katzberg; Z L Barbaric; R Spataro; K Iwamoto; J J Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Computed tomography in the diagnosis of renal masses.

Authors:  A D Magilner; B J Ostrum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  CT-determined canine kidney and urine iodine concentration following intravenous administration of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide, iopamidol, and sodium ioxaglate.

Authors:  R E Brennan; S Rapoport; I Weinberg; H M Pollack; J A Curtis
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.

Authors:  A C Winfield; R J Dray; F K Kirchner; C A Muhletaler; R R Price
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the use of contrast media with different iodine concentrations for multidetector CT of the kidney.

Authors:  Seung Chai Jung; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Computed tomography urography with iterative reconstruction algorithm in congenital urinary tract abnormalities in children - association of radiation dose with image quality.

Authors:  Przemysław Bombiński; Michał Brzewski; Stanisław Warchoł; Agnieszka Biejat; Marcin Banasiuk; Marek Gołębiowski
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-27

Review 3.  Multidetector CT urography in imaging of the urinary tract in patients with hematuria.

Authors:  Michael M Maher; Mannudeep K Kalra; Stefania Rizzo; Peter R Mueller; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Split-bolus CT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase in dogs: comparison of image quality with three-phase CT urography and optimal allocation ratio of contrast medium.

Authors:  Hyejin Je; Sang Kwon Lee; Jin Woo Jung; Youjung Jang; Saran Chhoey; Jihye Choi
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.