Literature DB >> 21277813

Off-resonance saturation MRI of superparamagnetic nanoprobes: theoretical models and experimental validations.

Chalermchai Khemtong1, Osamu Togao, Jimin Ren, Chase W Kessinger, Masaya Takahashi, A Dean Sherry, Jinming Gao.   

Abstract

Off-resonance saturation (ORS) is a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method that has shown greatly improved contrast sensitivity for the detection of cancer-specific biomarkers by superparamagnetic nanoprobes in vivo. However, quantitative understanding of the ORS contrast mechanism and its dependence on the structural parameters of superparamagnetic nanoprobes are still lacking. Here we propose a quantitative model of ORS contrast and its experimental validation by superparamagnetic polymeric micelles (SPPM) with precisely controlled structural properties. Size selected, monodisperse Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles (6.1 ± 0.2 nm) were used to form a series of SPPM nanoprobes with specifically controlled corona thickness using 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (DSPE-PEG) with different PEG molecular weights. Transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering showed that SPPM were uniform in size. The average hydrodynamic diameters of SPPM with PEG lengths of 0.55, 1, 2, and 5 kD were 16.6 ± 2.8, 18.4 ± 2.9, 24.1 ± 3.4, and 28.9 ± 3.4 nm, respectively. MRI experiments at 7 T determined that r₂ values of SPPM with 0.55, 1, 2, and 5 kD PEG as corona were 201 ± 3, 136 ± 8, 107 ± 5, and 108 ± 8 FemM⁻¹s⁻¹, respectively. ORS intensity from Z-spectra of SPPM showed a significant correlation with the inverse of T₂ relaxation rates (1/T₂, s⁻¹) of the SPPM nanoprobes regardless of the PEG corona thickness. These data provide the fundamental understanding of the structure-property relationships between the SPPM nanostructures and ORS sensitivity, which offers useful mechanistic insights for the future improvement of SPPM nanoprobes in cancer molecular imaging applications.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277813      PMCID: PMC3045750          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  32 in total

1.  Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Charles H Cunningham; Takayasu Arai; Phillip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; John M Pauly; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  FeCo/graphitic-shell nanocrystals as advanced magnetic-resonance-imaging and near-infrared agents.

Authors:  Won Seok Seo; Jin Hyung Lee; Xiaoming Sun; Yoriyasu Suzuki; David Mann; Zhuang Liu; Masahiro Terashima; Philip C Yang; Michael V McConnell; Dwight G Nishimura; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Off-resonance saturation as a means of generating contrast with superparamagnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Omar Zurkiya; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging.

Authors:  Daniel L J Thorek; Antony K Chen; Julie Czupryna; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Functionalized micellar systems for cancer targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Damon Sutton; Norased Nasongkla; Elvin Blanco; Jinming Gao
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Noninvasive vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 imaging identifies inflammatory activation of cells in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Matthias Nahrendorf; Farouc A Jaffer; Kimberly A Kelly; David E Sosnovik; Elena Aikawa; Peter Libby; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents: physicochemical characteristics and applications in MR imaging.

Authors:  Y X Wang; S M Hussain; G P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Zinc ferrite nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Carlos Bárcena; Amandeep K Sra; Girija S Chaubey; Chalermchai Khemtong; J Ping Liu; Jinming Gao
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 10.  Polymeric nanomedicine for cancer MR imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Chalermchai Khemtong; Chase W Kessinger; Jinming Gao
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  4 in total

1.  Theoretical analysis and optimization of ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging contrast with off-resonance saturation.

Authors:  Michael Carl; Yajun Ma; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Improving the magnetic resonance imaging contrast and detection methods with engineered magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Xiaodong Zhong; Liya Wang; Lily Yang; Hui Mao
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 3.  Bioresponsive Nanomaterials: Recent Advances in Cancer Multimodal Imaging and Imaging-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Zeng Zeng; Huali Gao; CongXian Chen; Lianbo Xiao; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Recent Advances in 19Fluorine Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Perfluorocarbon Emulsions.

Authors:  Anne H Schmieder; Shelton D Caruthers; Jochen Keupp; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  Engineering (Beijing)       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 7.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.