Literature DB >> 3773097

Frozen section detection of lymph node metastases in prostatic carcinoma: accuracy in grossly uninvolved pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.

J I Epstein, J E Oesterling, J C Eggleston, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

We reviewed our frozen section experience with 310 pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens during the last 5 years. A total of 40 patients (12.9 per cent) had positive lymph nodes on permanent section. In 6 of these patients the lymph nodes were involved grossly and in 34 there were only microscopic metastases. Intraoperative assessment of lymph node involvement classified correctly 299 patients (96.5 per cent of the total number). Whereas previous studies have demonstrated a failure on frozen section to detect all but a few microscopic metastases, we were able by frozen section to identify metastases in 23 of 34 patients (67.6 per cent) with grossly uninvolved lymph nodes. Of the positive frozen sections 16 were in patients with unilateral metastases only, and in 13 of these cases frozen section identified the only positive node present. The average diameter of the metastases found on frozen section was 2.4 mm. In 11 of the 34 patients frozen section did not disclose any of the metastases present on permanent sections (average 1.4 mm.) (false negative rate 3.5 per cent of all patients, 27.5 per cent of those with positive nodes and 32.3 per cent of those with microscopic involvement of lymph nodes only). Ten patients had unilateral metastases and 1 had bilateral involvement. The ability to identify the majority of microscopic metastases, given their adverse effect on prognosis, supports the usefulness of routine frozen section on grossly uninvolved pelvic lymph nodes as a staging procedure before radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3773097     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45295-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on histopathological evaluation of lymphadenectomy specimens from prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Conti; Matteo Santoni; Luciano Burattini; Marina Scarpelli; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Andrea B Galosi; Liang Cheng; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Sentinel node evaluation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramkishen Narayanan; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

Review 5.  ACP Broadsheet No 146: August 1995. Macroscopic examination of prostatic specimens.

Authors:  P Harnden; M C Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Accuracy and cost of intraoperative lymph node frozen sections at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M P Young; R S Kirby; E P O'Donoghue; M C Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Clinical significance of regional lymph node enlargement in patients with EGC within the expanded criteria for ESD.

Authors:  Dong Seok Lee; Jong Kyu Park; Sang Jin Lee; Gab Jin Cheon
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for pelvic lymph node dissection?

Authors:  J C Kim; G S Gerber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.