Literature DB >> 3772827

Gating of sensory information: joint computations of phase and amplitude data in the midbrain of the electric fish, Eigenmannia.

W Heiligenberg, G Rose.   

Abstract

Eigenmannia is able to determine whether the electric organ discharge (EOD) of a neighbor is of higher or lower frequency than its own EOD. For small frequency differences, Df, the fish avoids jamming by shifting its frequency away from that of its neighbor. This jamming avoidance response (JAR), therefore, requires that the fish discriminate the sign of Df. The interference pattern of two EODs of similar frequency is characterized by local modulations of the instantaneous amplitude and the spatial difference of the instantaneous phase, or 'differential phase', of the mixed signal. When amplitude and differential phase are plotted in a two-dimensional state plane, circular graphs are obtained with a sense of rotation that reflects the sign of Df. Behavioral studies have shown that both amplitude and differential phase modulations are required for the control of the JAR. Considering two regions of the body surface, A and B, that receive strong and weak contamination by the jamming signal, respectively, rises and falls of the signal amplitude in A will be accompanied by respective advances and delays of the signal in A relative to that in B if the jamming signal is of lower frequency, i.e. if Df is negative. A plot of amplitude versus different phase yields a clockwise sense of rotation in this case. The opposite relation between amplitude and phase modulations, resulting in a counterclockwise rotation, holds for a positive Df. For the less strongly contaminated area B, however, the relation between the sign of Df and the sense of rotation is reversed, so that for a negative Df, a rise of amplitude in B will coincide with a delay of the signal in B relative to that in A. By independent experimental control of amplitude and differential-phase modulations, we explored midbrain neurons that discriminate the sense of rotations in the amplitude-phase plane. We found that these neurons achieve this discrimination by gating amplitude inputs by differential-phase information, thus exploiting the particular combinations of amplitude and differential phase that characterize a given sense of rotation. Since the response properties of such neurons only reflect the sense of rotation, and since the same sense of rotation can be obtained for either sign of Df (depending upon the relative contamination of the receptive fields involved), individual neurons do not yet provide unambiguous information about the sign of Df.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772827     DOI: 10.1007/bf00603977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Limits of phase and amplitude sensitivity in the torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia.

Authors:  G Rose; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Neural coding of difference frequencies in the midbrain of the electric fish Eigenmannia: reading the sense of rotation in an amplitude-phase plane.

Authors:  G Rose; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia.

Authors:  H Scheich; T H Bullock; R H Hamstra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Phase and amplitude computations in the midbrain of an electric fish: intracellular studies of neurons participating in the jamming avoidance response of Eigenmannia.

Authors:  W Heiligenberg; G Rose
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal hyperacuity in the electric sense of fish.

Authors:  G Rose; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Nov 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons.

Authors:  R A Andersen; G K Essick; R M Siegel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Structure and function of electrosensory neurons in the torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia: morphological correlates of phase and amplitude sensitivity.

Authors:  G Rose; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Laminar organization of the afferent and efferent systems of the torus semicircularis of gymnotiform fish: morphological substrates for parallel processing in the electrosensory system.

Authors:  C E Carr; L Maler; W Heiligenberg; E Sas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1981-12-20       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  8 in total

1.  Walter Heiligenberg: the jamming avoidance response and beyond.

Authors:  G K H Zupanc; T H Bullock
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Encoding and processing biologically relevant temporal information in electrosensory systems.

Authors:  E S Fortune; G J Rose; M Kawasaki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Central processing of sensory information in electric fish.

Authors:  W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  'Recognition units' at the top of a neuronal hierarchy? Prepacemaker neurons in Eigenmannia code the sign of frequency differences unambiguously.

Authors:  G J Rose; M Kawasaki; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  'Ancestral' neural mechanisms of electrolocation suggest a substrate for the evolution of the jamming avoidance response.

Authors:  G Rose; C Keller; W Heiligenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Phantoms in the brain: ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  Bruce A Carlson
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-11-01

7.  Independently evolved jamming avoidance responses employ identical computational algorithms: a behavioral study of the African electric fish, Gymnarchus niloticus.

Authors:  M Kawasaki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  The African wave-type electric fish, Gymnarchus niloticus, lacks corollary discharge mechanisms for electrosensory gating.

Authors:  M Kawasaki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.836

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.