Literature DB >> 3772540

Using audiometric data base analysis.

J D Royster, L H Royster.   

Abstract

Audiometric data base analysis (ADBA) offers the most direct means of judging the effectiveness of a hearing conservation program (HCP) in preventing occupational hearing loss. However, numerous factors need to be accounted for if the findings are to be meaningful. This paper discusses several parameters known to influence the interpretation of group data statistics in assessing HCP effectiveness. Testing factors that affect the stability of the data base include audiometric techniques, calibration procedures, testing environment, and the motivation and prior experience of the subject. Pertinent population parameters include age, sex, race, current and prior noise exposures, learning effects, and the types of hearing protectors in use. Two case histories are presented to illustrate the application of ADBA techniques. Specific analysis procedures reviewed include comparisons of mean thresholds for selected industrial and nonindustrial populations, rates of change in mean hearing levels over a period of time, baseline and sequential test-retest comparisons, and different threshold shift criteria. The preliminary results of ADBA research being done by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S12.12 Working Group are summarized, including desirable criterion ranges for several statistics established by applying them to control data sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772540     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-198610000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  7 in total

1.  Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.

Authors:  R L Neitzel; D Galusha; C Dixon-Ernst; P M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers.

Authors:  Monique C J Leensen; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Christa L Themann; Taichi K Murata
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Longitudinal screening of hearing threshold in navy divers: is diving really a hazard?

Authors:  Thijs T Wingelaar; Edwin L Endert; Rigo Hoencamp; Peter-Jan Am van Ooij; Rob A van Hulst
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 0.887

5.  Evaluation of audiometric threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kenneth E James; Jane S Gordon; Kelly M Reavis; David S Phillips; Gene W Bratt; Stephen A Fausti
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Noise exposure and hearing loss among sand and gravel miners.

Authors:  Deborah Landen; Steve Wilkins; Mark Stephenson; Linda McWilliams
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Estimating miners at risk for occupational noise-induced hearing loss: A review of data from a South African platinum mine.

Authors:  Liepollo Ntlhakana; Gill Nelson; Katijah Khoza-Shangase
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-03-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.