Literature DB >> 27414471

Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.

William J Murphy1, Christa L Themann1, Taichi K Murata1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This field study aimed to assess the noise reduction of hearing protection for individual workers, demonstrate the effectiveness of training on the level of protection achieved, and measure the time required to implement hearing protector fit testing in the workplace.
DESIGN: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducted field studies in Louisiana and Texas to test the performance of HPD Well-Fit. STUDY SAMPLE: Fit tests were performed on 126 inspectors and engineers working in the offshore oil industry.
RESULTS: Workers were fit tested with the goal of achieving a 25-dB PAR. Less than half of the workers were achieving sufficient protection from their hearing protectors prior to NIOSH intervention and training; following re-fitting and re-training, over 85% of the workers achieved sufficient protection. Typical test times were 6-12 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Fit testing of the workers' earplugs identified those workers who were and were not achieving the desired level of protection. Recommendations for other hearing protection solutions were made for workers who could not achieve the target PAR. The study demonstrates the need for individual hearing protector fit testing and addresses some of the barriers to implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral measures; hearing conservation; instrumentation; noise

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27414471      PMCID: PMC5333758          DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1204470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  15 in total

1.  Four earplugs in search of a rating system.

Authors:  J R Franks; W J Murphy; J L Johnson; D A Harris
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.

Authors:  William J Murphy; John R Franks; Elliott H Berger; Alberto Behar; John G Casali; Christine Dixon-Ernst; Edward F Krieg; Ben T Mozo; Julia D Royster; Larry H Royster; Stephen D Simon; Carol Stephenson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.

Authors:  John R Franks; William J Murphy; Dave A Harris; Jennifer L Johnson; Peter B Shaw
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

4.  Use of historical data and a novel metric in the evaluation of the effectiveness of hearing conservation program components.

Authors:  Nicholas Heyer; Thais C Morata; Lynne E Pinkerton; Scott E Brueck; Daniel Stancescu; Mary Prince Panaccio; Hyoshin Kim; J Stephen Sinclair; Martha A Waters; Cherie F Estill; John R Franks
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Hearing difficulty attributable to employment by industry and occupation: an analysis of the National Health Interview Survey--United States, 1997 to 2003.

Authors:  SangWoo Tak; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Hearing loss prevention for carpenters: part 2 - demonstration projects using individualized and group training.

Authors:  Mark R Stephenson; Peter B Shaw; Carol Merry Stephenson; Pamela S Graydon
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.

Authors:  E H Berger; J R Franks; A Behar; J G Casali; C Dixon-Ernst; R W Kieper; C J Merry; B T Mozo; C W Nixon; D Ohlin; J D Royster; L H Royster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Using audiometric data base analysis.

Authors:  J D Royster; L H Royster
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-10

9.  Examination effects in audiometric testing of children.

Authors:  A F Roche; D Mukherjee; W C Chumlea; T F Champney
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1983

10.  Trends in worker hearing loss by industry sector, 1981-2010.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Masterson; James A Deddens; Christa L Themann; Stephen Bertke; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.214

View more
  7 in total

1.  Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.

Authors:  Stephanie K Sayler; Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Kan Sun; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Translation research in occupational safety and health: A proposed framework.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Thomas R Cunningham; Leslie Nickels; Sarah Felknor; Rebecca Guerin; Fred Blosser; Chia-Chia Chang; Pietra Check; Donald Eggerth; Michael Flynn; Christy Forrester; David Hard; Heidi Hudson; Jennifer Lincoln; Lauralynn T McKernan; Preethi Pratap; Carol M Stephenson; Donna Van Bogaert; Lauren Menger-Ogle
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A deep neural-network classifier for photograph-based estimation of hearing protection attenuation and fit.

Authors:  Christoper J Smalt; Gregory A Ciccarelli; Aaron R Rodriguez; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in an Auto Parts Factory in China.

Authors:  Wei Gong; Liangliang Zhao; Ling Li; Thais C Morata; Wei Qiu; Huiling Amy Feng; Baoli Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 7.468

7.  Field Attenuation of Foam Earplugs.

Authors:  Fran Copelli; Alberto Behar; Tina Ngoc Le; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-10-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.