Literature DB >> 3769248

One-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty.

B M Wroblewski.   

Abstract

A prospective study of a one-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty was carried out in 102 consecutive cases using acrylic cement with 0.5 g of gentamicin in each 40 g pack as well as systemic and oral antibiotics. Thirty percent had a sinus tract at some stage before the revision. The most common infecting organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, either as a pure growth or in combination with other organisms. The success rate was 91%, with an average follow-up study of three years and two months. The infection persisted in 9% of the cases. In three cases, infection was correlated with some aspect of the revision technique. The method gave a higher success rate than that obtained without the use of an antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. Combined systemic and oral use of antibiotics appears to reduce the recurrence rate still further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3769248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  [One stage revision of infected total hip replacements with replacement of bone loss by allografts. Study of 90 cases of which 46 used bone allografts].

Authors:  B Loty; M Postel; J Evrard; P Matron; J P Courpied; M Kerboull; B Tomeno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: our experience with interval prosthesis.

Authors:  N Prasad; V Paringe; R Kotwal; A Ghandour; R Morgan Jones
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-05

Review 3.  [Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].

Authors:  R Windhager; A Leithner; M Hochegger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  B Lehner; D Witte; A J Suda; S Weiss
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Massive reconstruction of acetabulum and proximal femur].

Authors:  D G Poitout; P Tropiano; M Bernat; J F Moulene
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 7.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

8.  Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange.

Authors:  Matthias Wolf; Heimo Clar; Jörg Friesenbichler; Gerold Schwantzer; Gerwin Bernhardt; Gerald Gruber; Mathias Glehr; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; C-H Flouzat-Lachianette; R Jalil; Sobrinho Uirassu Batista; I Guissou; A Poignard
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-03-02

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.