Literature DB >> 3760337

Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms.

J S Bradley.   

Abstract

Three different types of acoustical measures were compared as predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms of varied size and acoustical conditions. These included signal-to-noise measures, the speech transmission index derived from modulation transfer functions, and useful/detrimental sound ratios obtained from early/late sound ratios, speech, and background levels. The most successful forms of each type of measure were of similar prediction accuracy, but the useful/detrimental ratios based on a 0.08-s early time interval were most accurate. Several physical measures, although based on very different calculation procedures, were quite strongly related to each other.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3760337     DOI: 10.1121/1.393907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Hallie M Plevinsky; John M Franco; Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Excessive noise levels are noted in kindergarten classrooms in the island of Crete.

Authors:  Nikolaos S Chatzakis; Alexander D Karatzanis; Meropi E Helidoni; Stelios G Velegrakis; Panagiotis Christodoulou; Georgios A Velegrakis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza; Nirmal K Srinivasan; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The effect of technology and testing environment on speech perception using telehealth with cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Daniel L Valente; Ryan W McCreery; Gina R Diaz; Todd Sanford; Roger Harpster
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Children's understanding of instructions presented in noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Crystal M Manninen; Daniel L Valente; Nicholas A Smith
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Reference-Free Assessment of Speech Intelligibility Using Bispectrum of an Auditory Neurogram.

Authors:  Mohammad E Hossain; Wissam A Jassim; Muhammad S A Zilany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spoken Word Recognition Enhancement Due to Preceding Synchronized Beats Compared to Unsynchronized or Unrhythmic Beats.

Authors:  Christos Sidiras; Vasiliki Iliadou; Ioannis Nimatoudis; Tobias Reichenbach; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.