Literature DB >> 3752089

Clients' interpretation of risks provided in genetic counseling.

D C Wertz, J R Sorenson, T C Heeren.   

Abstract

Clients in 544 genetic counseling sessions who were given numeric risks of having a child with a birth defect between 0% and 50% were asked to interpret these numeric risks on a five-point scale, ranging from very low to very high. Whereas clients' modal interpretation varied directly with numeric risks between 0% and 15%, the modal category of client risk interpretation remained "moderate" at risks between 15% and 50%. Uncertainty about normalcy of the next child increased as numeric risk increased, and few clients were willing to indicate that the child would probably or definitely be affected regardless of the numeric risk. Characteristics associated with clients' "pessimistic" interpretations of risk, identified by stepwise linear regression, included increased numeric risk, discussion in depth during the counseling session of whether they would have a child, have a living affected child, discussion of the effects of an affected child on relationships with client's other children, and seriousness of the disorder in question (causes intellectual impairment). Client interpretations are discussed in terms of recent developments in cognitive theory, including heuristics that influence judgments about risks, and implications for genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3752089      PMCID: PMC1683918     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  9 in total

1.  The amniocentesis decision: an explicit guide for parents.

Authors:  S P Pauker; S G Pauker
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1979

2.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Patients' subjective interpretation of risks offered in genetic counselling.

Authors:  J H Pearn
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Social benefit versus technological risk.

Authors:  C Starr
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Genetic counseling: parents' responses to uncertainty.

Authors:  A Lippman-Hand; F C Fraser
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1979

6.  Does genetic counseling influence risk attitudes and decision making?

Authors:  M L Lubs
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1979

7.  Elaboration of the definition of genetic counseling into a model for counselee decision-making.

Authors:  R G Bringle; R M Antley
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1980

8.  Genetic counseling--the postcounseling period: I. Parents' perceptions of uncertainty.

Authors:  A Lippman-Hand; F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1979

9.  Genetic counseling and reproductive uncertainty.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J R Sorenson; T C Heeren
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-05
  9 in total
  25 in total

1.  "Respect for autonomy" in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal.

Authors:  Mary Terrell White
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Provider gender and moral reasoning: the politics of an "ethics of care.

Authors:  Dorothy C Wertz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Perception of genetic risk among genetic counselors.

Authors:  J Roggenbuck; J E Olson; T A Sellers; C Ludowese
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Educational resources: DNA in medicine: School-based education.

Authors:  J D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Feature article: Recombinant DNA technology, genetic tests, and public policy.

Authors:  N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genomic testing reaches into the womb.

Authors:  Malorye Allison
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain.

Authors:  C G Palmer; F Sainfort
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A comparison of two approaches to education about carrier testing for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  K P Leonard; L K Bartholomew; P R Swank; G S Parcel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Making sense of genetic uncertainty: the role of religion and spirituality.

Authors:  Mary T White
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.