Literature DB >> 5803536

Social benefit versus technological risk.

C Starr.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1969        PMID： 5803536     DOI： 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  49 in total

1.  The perception and communication of risk: a guide for the local health agency.

Authors:  T Sly
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

2.  Trading jobs for health: ionizing radiation, occupational ethics, and the welfare argument.

Authors:  Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Science in a political environment.

Authors:  Peter Weingart
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  A semi-quantitative approach to GMO risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  E Jane Morris
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Communicating information about the health risks of radioactive waste: a review of obstacles to public understanding.

Authors:  V T Covello
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1989 Apr-May

Review 6.  Bioconservatism, bioliberalism, and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance.

Authors:  Rebecca Roache; Steve Clarke
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2009-03

Review 7.  Risk assessment of drugs.

Authors:  E Somers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Nuclear safety in the unexpected second nuclear era.

Authors:  Yican Wu; Zhibin Chen; Zhen Wang; Shanqi Chen; Daochuan Ge; Chao Chen; Jiangtao Jia; Yazhou Li; Ming Jin; Tao Zhou; Fang Wang; Liqin Hu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Nuclear energy, ten years after Fukushima.

Authors:  Aditi Verma; Ali Ahmad; Francesca Giovannini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology.

Authors:  Shirley S Ho; Dietram A Scheufele; Elizabeth A Corley
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.253
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.