Literature DB >> 3748092

The influence of diagnostic radiography on the incidence of breast cancer and leukemia.

J S Evans, J E Wennberg, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

Little accurate information is available on the influence of diagnostic radiography on the incidence of cancer in the general population, largely because of a lack of knowledge of the numbers and the age distributions of patients undergoing radiographic examinations. We used such information from a closed population in Maine that was followed for a year, along with data from the literature on the absorbed dose from typical examinations and a mathematical model linking dose to the incidence rate of cancer, to estimate the numbers of cases of radiologically induced cancer of the bone marrow and breast. Our data indicate that about 1 percent of all cases of leukemia and less than 1 percent of all cases of breast cancer result from diagnostic radiography. In addition, such tumors generally occur late in life; the incidence of radiation-induced leukemia was highest at 69 years, and the incidence of radiation-induced breast cancer was highest at 76 years. Thus, diagnostic radiography has only a small influence on the occurrence of leukemia and breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3748092     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198609253151306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  8 in total

1.  Ionizing radiation exposure--more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Carlo Ammendolia; Cindy Peterson; John A M Taylor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-06

2.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

3.  Lifetime exposure to radiation from imaging investigations.

Authors:  J Douglas Hall; Marshall Godwin; Tessa Clarke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Harvard report on cancer prevention. Causes of human cancer. Radiation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Assessing the ability of an instrumental variable causal forest algorithm to personalize treatment evidence using observational data: the case of early surgery for shoulder fracture.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Cole G Chapman; Sarah B Floyd; Brian K Chen; Charles A Thigpen; Michael Kissenberth
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

6.  Diagnostic radiography as a risk factor for chronic myeloid and monocytic leukaemia (CML).

Authors:  S Preston-Martin; D C Thomas; M C Yu; B E Henderson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Geriatric Ischemic Stroke Patients: Are the Rates Right?

Authors:  John M Brooks; Cole G Chapman; Manish Suneja; Mary C Schroeder; Michelle A Fravel; Kathleen M Schneider; June Wilwert; Yi-Jhen Li; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Douglas W Brenton; Marian Brenton; Jennifer Robinson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Chronic myeloid leukaemia following repeated exposure to chest radiography and computed tomography in a patient with pneumothorax: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Fang-He Ju; Xu-Bo Gong; Li-Bin Jiang; Hui-Hua Hong; Jun-Chao Yang; Ting-Zhen Xu; Y U Chen; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.967

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.