Literature DB >> 17273500

Lifetime exposure to radiation from imaging investigations.

J Douglas Hall1, Marshall Godwin, Tessa Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess levels of radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging among family practice patients, the degree to which these levels exceed recommended levels, and whether radiation exposure level is associated with a diagnosis of cancer.
DESIGN: Chart abstraction.
SETTING: Six practices in an academic family medicine centre and 1 family practice in the community. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years with at least 20 years' information on their charts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All x-ray procedures, the dates they were performed, the amount of radiation exposure from each procedure based on standard charts, and whether diagnosis of any form of cancer was noted on the chart.
RESULTS: Mean lifetime radiation exposure was 14.94 mSv. No patients had exceeded the lifetime occupational limit of 400 mSv; however, 4.4% of patients had exceeded the annual occupational exposure limit of 20 mSv at some point in their lives. Mean lifetime exposure of those with cancer was found to be significantly higher than exposure of those without cancer. This difference was due to the extra radiation exposure after the cancer was diagnosed; hence a causal relationship was not shown. Mean level of annual radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging has been slowly increasing since the 1960s.
CONCLUSION: The current lifetime level of radiation to which patients are exposed by diagnostic imaging appears to be far below the maximum recommended level. Some patients do exceed the maximum recommended annual level, but this overexposure is generally warranted due to serious medical illness or injury, and the benefit outweighs the risk. We found no evidence of an association between these low levels of radiation and development of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17273500      PMCID: PMC1781500     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  12 in total

1.  The distribution of medical X-ray doses amongst individuals in the British population.

Authors:  D Hart; J C Le Heron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Evaluation of doses to patients in X-ray diagnostics in Poland.

Authors:  M A Staniszewska
Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Utilization of radiologic services in different payment systems and patient populations.

Authors:  J H Burkhardt; J H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Diagnostic radiology: major weapon in patient care or weapon of mass destruction?

Authors:  Michael Brant-Zawadzki
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board.

Authors:  B F Wall; D Hart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Effects of low-level radiation and comparative risk.

Authors:  W K Sinclair
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study.

Authors:  M M Doody; J E Lonstein; M Stovall; D G Hacker; N Luckyanov; C E Land
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry.

Authors:  W Huda; R L Morin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A dosage response curve for the one rad range: adult risks from diagnostic radiation.

Authors:  I D Bross; M Ball; S Falen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  1 in total

1.  Severe thoracic or abdominal injury in major trauma patients can safely be ruled out by "Valutazione Integrata Bed Side" evaluation without total body CT scan.

Authors:  Giannazzo Giuseppe; Melara Ilaria; D'Argenzio Federico; Coppa Alessandro; Gualtieri Simona; Peiman Nazerian; Bartolini Marco; Grifoni Stefano
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 1.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.