Literature DB >> 11956347

The dependence of binocular contrast sensitivities on binocular single vision in normal and amblyopic human subjects.

A S Hood1, J D Morrison.   

Abstract

We have measured monocular and binocular contrast sensitivities in response to medium to high spatial frequencies of vertical sinusoidal grating patterns in normal subjects, anisometropic amblyopes, strabismic amblyopes and non-amblyopic esotropes. On binocular viewing, contrast sensitivities were slightly but significantly increased in normal subjects, markedly increased in anisometropes and esotropes with anomalous binocular single vision (BSV) and significantly reduced in esotropes and exotropes without BSV. Application of a prismatic correction to the strabismic eye in order to achieve bifoveal stimulation resulted in a significant reduction in contrast sensitivity in esotropes with and without anomalous BSV, in exotropes and in non-amblyopic esotropes. Control experiments in normal subjects with monocular viewing showed that degradative effects of the prism occurred only with high prism powers and at high spatial frequencies, thus establishing that the reduced contrast sensitivities were the consequence of bifoveal stimulation rather than optical degradation. Displacement of the image of the grating pattern by 2 deg. in normal subjects and anisometropes by a dichoptic method to simulate a small angle esotropia had no effect on the contrast sensitivities recorded through the companion eye. By contrast, esotropes showed similar reductions in contrast sensitivity to those obtained with the prism experiments, confirming a fundamental difference between subjects with normal and abnormal ocular alignments. The results have thus established a suppressive action of the fovea of the amblyopic eye acting on the companion, non-amblyopic eye and indicate that correction of ocular misalignments in adult esotropes may be disadvantageous to binocular visual performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956347      PMCID: PMC2290246          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  45 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Local circuits in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  E M Callaway
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18.

Authors:  D H Hubel; M S Livingstone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings.

Authors:  J E Ross; D D Clarke; A J Bron
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Mechanisms of stereopsis in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  G E Poggio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Reaction time as a measure of binocular interaction in human vision.

Authors:  R Blake; W Martens; A Di Gianfilippo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification.

Authors:  R F Hess; E R Howell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Amblyopia: a mini review of the literature.

Authors:  Evgenia Kanonidou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Disparity tuning of binocular facilitation and suppression after normal versus abnormal visual development.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; Julia Hale; Mark W Pettet; Suzanne P McKee; Richard A Harrad
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Contrast Sensitivity in Microtropic and Anisometropic Eyes of Successfully Treated Amblyopes.

Authors:  Özlem Öner; Sezin Akça Bayar; Sibel Oto; Onur Gökmen; Mustafa Agah Tekindal
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.