Literature DB >> 3733698

The salt dependence of chicken and yeast chromatin structure. Effects on internucleosomal organization and relation to active chromatin.

D Lohr.   

Abstract

The ionic strength dependences of yeast and chicken erythrocyte chromatin structure have been examined by analysis of nuclear DNase I and Staphylococcal nuclease digestions done under various salt and divalent cation concentrations. The basic features of yeast DNase I profiles (intracore/intercore patterns and their 5-base pair offset) remain present under all conditions tested. However, there are changes in specific parts of the patterns. In very low salt, the intercore DNase I pattern is enhanced; even very small intercore bands can be detected. Staphylococcal nuclease intracore cleavage becomes prominent. Increasing salt enhances the large DNase I intracore bands and the frequency of spacer cleavage for both nucleases. Thus, yeast has a salt-dependent higher order structure: a chromatin fiber with a prominent spacer/core distinction in (physiological) salt; a fiber with a decreased distinction between spacer and core, i.e. a more uniform fiber, in very low salt. The salt-dependent bulk changes resemble single gene chromatin changes during gene expression and may provide a model for that process. Above bands 16.5-17.5, chicken and yeast intercore patterns are coincident. Thus, at least a fraction of chicken chromatin has discrete length spacers like yeast does. This fraction may be significant, for the prominence of the intercore pattern, and hence the apparent abundance of discrete spacers, can be significantly enhanced by digestion in very low salt. The major differences between the two chromatins are in the intracore/intercore transition region: the region is larger and more complex in chicken; ionic strength changes affect the chicken transition region more strongly. Since this region of the profile corresponds to digestion near the ends of the core, that part of the nucleosome must differ in structure and in conformational flexibility in the two chromatins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3733698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  11 in total

1.  A statistical thermodynamic model applied to experimental AFM population and location data is able to quantify DNA-histone binding strength and internucleosomal interaction differences between acetylated and unacetylated nucleosomal arrays.

Authors:  F J Solis; R Bash; J Yodh; S M Lindsay; D Lohr
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Short nucleosome repeats impose rotational modulations on chromatin fibre folding.

Authors:  Sarah J Correll; Michaela H Schubert; Sergei A Grigoryev
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Higher-order structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin.

Authors:  P T Lowary; J Widom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A relationship between the helical twist of DNA and the ordered positioning of nucleosomes in all eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  J Widom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Attachment of DNA to the nucleoskeleton of HeLa cells examined using physiological conditions.

Authors:  D A Jackson; P Dickinson; P R Cook
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Nucleosome spacing periodically modulates nucleosome chain folding and DNA topology in circular nucleosome arrays.

Authors:  Mikhail V Bass; Tatiana Nikitina; Davood Norouzi; Victor B Zhurkin; Sergei A Grigoryev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Biochemical characterization of chromatin fractions isolated from induced and uninduced Friend erythroleukemia cells.

Authors:  O Knosp; B Redl; B Puschendorf
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 8.  Chromatin Higher-Order Folding: A Perspective with Linker DNA Angles.

Authors:  Sergei A Grigoryev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Nucleosomal arrangement affects single-molecule transcription dynamics.

Authors:  Veronika Fitz; Jaeoh Shin; Christoph Ehrlich; Lucas Farnung; Patrick Cramer; Vasily Zaburdaev; Stephan W Grill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Conformational Dynamics of Histone H3 Tails in Chromatin.

Authors:  Mohamad Zandian; Nicole Gonzalez Salguero; Matthew D Shannon; Rudra N Purusottam; Theint Theint; Michael G Poirier; Christopher P Jaroniec
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.888

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.