Literature DB >> 3725653

Cefotaxime vs. conventional therapy for the treatment of bacterial meningitis of infants and children.

C M Odio, I Faingezicht, J L Salas, J Guevara, E Mohs, G H McCracken.   

Abstract

Eighty-five infants and children were prospectively randomized to receive cefotaxime or ampicillin and chloramphenicol for therapy of bacterial meningitis. The two therapy groups of patients were comparable as to sex, age, clinical status on admission, prior administration of antibiotics and etiology. Three infants (7%) died in each therapy group. Mean number of days of positive cerebrospinal fluid cultures, time to defervescence and duration of treatment and of hospital stay and complications developing during treatment were similar for the two treatment regimens. Median cerebrospinal fluid bactericidal titers against the patients' pathogens in cefotaxime-treated patients (1:64) were larger than those in patients who received conventional therapy (1:8). Mild to moderate motor sequelae were more frequent in those given conventional therapy at the time of discharge only, and not at 4 months or longer of follow-up. We conclude that cefotaxime has similar efficacy when compared with conventional therapy for the management of bacterial meningitis in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3725653     DOI: 10.1097/00006454-198607000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis        ISSN: 0277-9730


  14 in total

Review 1.  Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  K Prasad; A Kumar; P K Gupta; T Singhal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

2.  Bacterial meningitis in India: an IJP survey.

Authors:  S K Kabra; P Kumar; I C Verma; D Mukherjee; B H Chowdhary; S Sengupta; R N Singh; S P Khatua; N Miglani; K M Sehai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  In vitro antibiotic sensitivity pattern of common bacterial isolates from cases of acute bacterial meningitis with special reference to ceftriaxone.

Authors:  B N Rao; I M Kashbur; N M Shembesh; S M el Bargathy
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Cefotaxime versus chloramphenicol for ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. A retrospective study of 62 cases.

Authors:  J R Lapointe; L Chicoine
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Evaluation of CP-99,219, a new fluoroquinolone, for treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.

Authors:  M M París; S M Hickey; M Trujillo; S Shelton; G H McCracken
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Cephalosporins in the treatment of meningitis.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: mechanisms, clinical importance and consequences for therapy.

Authors:  R de Groot; G Dzoljic-Danilovic; B van Klingeren; W H Goessens; H J Neyens
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of cefotaxime in the management of pediatric infections.

Authors:  R F Jacobs
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?

Authors:  T Duke; A Michael; D Mokela; T Wal; J Reeder
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.