Literature DB >> 12765927

Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?

T Duke1, A Michael, D Mokela, T Wal, J Reeder.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine in children with meningitis whether there is any difference in mortality and neurological sequelae using chloramphenicol as first line treatment, with a change to ceftriaxone if chloramphenicol resistance is shown in vitro, compared to using ceftriaxone as first line treatment, with a change to chloramphenicol if there is no evidence of in vitro resistance.
METHODS: An observational study with a retrospective control group nested within a randomised trial of fluid management for bacterial meningitis where clinical care was standardised. Chloramphenicol is standard treatment for bacterial meningitis in Papua New Guinea. In the first 150 cases we used chloramphenicol and only changed treatment to ceftriaxone if chloramphenicol resistance for cerebrospinal fluid isolates was proved. After finding 20% of Haemophilus influenzae were resistant to chloramphenicol, and that most affected children had poor outcomes, we changed to an alternative strategy. In the next 196 cases first line treatment was ceftriaxone and treatment was changed to chloramphenicol if the isolated bacteria were found to be susceptible.
RESULTS: When chloramphenicol was used as first line treatment for meningitis followed by ceftriaxone when in vitro resistance was shown, there was invariably a very poor outcome in chloramphenicol resistant disease (71% of children died or had severe neurological complications). Using ceftriaxone as first line treatment was effective in reducing mortality and neurological sequelae from chloramphenicol resistant Haemophilus influenzae type (71% v 9%, relative risk 0.13; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.87; p = 0.013). Changing to chloramphenicol if there was no evidence of in vitro resistance was less than half the cost of empirical use of ceftriaxone for a full course for all children with meningitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a third generation cephalosporin as first line treatment is effective in dealing with the problem of poor outcomes from meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae that is resistant to chloramphenicol, and a strategy of changing to chloramphenicol if in vitro susceptibility is shown will reduce the use of expensive third generation cephalosporins without comprising on clinical outcomes. This highlights the urgent need to reduce the costs of third generation cephalosporins, to improve bacteriological services in developing countries, and to introduce effective and affordable vaccines against H influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12765927      PMCID: PMC1763115          DOI: 10.1136/adc.88.6.536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  26 in total

1.  Antibiotic-resistant bacterial sepsis in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  T Duke
Journal:  P N G Med J       Date:  2000 Mar-Jun

2.  Comparison of ceftriaxone with standard therapy for bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  R W Steele; R W Bradsher
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  Emergence of drug resistance. Impact on bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  K P Klugman; S A Madhi
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.982

4.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone to ampicillin/chloramphenicol in the treatment of childhood meningitis.

Authors:  S C Aronoff; M D Reed; C A O'Brien; J L Blumer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Comparison of ceftriaxone and traditional therapy of bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  B L Congeni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Dexamethasone treatment in childhood bacterial meningitis in Malawi: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E M Molyneux; A L Walsh; H Forsyth; M Tembo; J Mwenechanya; K Kayira; L Bwanaisa; A Njobvu; S Rogerson; G Malenga
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Cefotaxime therapy of bacterial meningitis in children.

Authors:  T G Wells; J M Trang; A L Brown; B C Marmer; R F Jacobs
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  A prospective randomized comparison of cefotaxime vs ampicillin and chloramphenicol for bacterial meningitis in children.

Authors:  R F Jacobs; T G Wells; R W Steele; T Yamauchi
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.

Authors:  M A del Rio; D Chrane; S Shelton; G H McCracken; J D Nelson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-06-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  High prevalence of penicillin-insensitive pneumococci in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  M Gratten; S Naraqi; D Hansman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

1.  Preferral Antibiotic Treatment Policy to be adopted in the 'Integrated Management of Childhood Illness Strategy in all 
the Developing Countries?

Authors:  Fannah Al-Fannah; Rajiv Khandekar; Padmamohan Kurup; Samir Shah
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2009-10

2.  Predictors of acute bacterial meningitis in children from a malaria-endemic area of Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Moses Laman; Laurens Manning; Andrew R Greenhill; Trevor Mare; Audrey Michael; Silas Shem; John Vince; William Lagani; Ilomo Hwaiwhanje; Peter M Siba; Ivo Mueller; Timothy M E Davis
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  Pre-admission antibiotics for suspected cases of meningococcal disease.

Authors:  Thambu D Sudarsanam; Priscilla Rupali; Prathap Tharyan; Ooriapadickal Cherian Abraham; Kurien Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Increasing chloramphenicol resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Papua New Guinean children with acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  Laurens Manning; Moses Laman; Andrew R Greenhill; Audrey Michael; Peter Siba; Ivo Mueller; Timothy M E Davis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Use of clinical syndromes to target antibiotic prescribing in seriously ill children in malaria endemic area: observational study.

Authors:  James A Berkley; Kathryn Maitland; Isaiah Mwangi; Caroline Ngetsa; Saleem Mwarumba; Brett S Lowe; Charles R J C Newton; Kevin Marsh; J Anthony G Scott; Mike English
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-29

6.  Progressive increase in antimicrobial resistance among invasive isolates of Haemophilus influenzae obtained from children admitted to a hospital in Kilifi, Kenya, from 1994 to 2002.

Authors:  J Anthony G Scott; Salim Mwarumba; Caroline Ngetsa; Salome Njenga; Brett S Lowe; Mary P E Slack; James A Berkley; Isaiah Mwangi; Kathryn Maitland; Mike English; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Clinical features of bacterial meningitis among hospitalised children in Kenya.

Authors:  Christina W Obiero; Neema Mturi; Salim Mwarumba; Moses Ngari; Charles R Newton; Michaël Boele van Hensbroek; James A Berkley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Clinical outcome of pneumococcal meningitis during the emergence of pencillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: an observational study.

Authors:  Edilane L Gouveia; Joice N Reis; Brendan Flannery; Soraia M Cordeiro; Josilene B T Lima; Ricardo M Pinheiro; Kátia Salgado; Ana Veronica Mascarenhas; M Gloria Carvalho; Bernard W Beall; Mitermayer G Reis; Albert I Ko
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Duration of empirical therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis with third generation cephalosporin: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhi Zhao; Xueying Hua; Jialin Yu; Haibo Zhang; Juhua Li; Zhankui Li
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.318

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.