Literature DB >> 3725188

Mechanically evoked cerebral potentials and long-latency muscle responses in the evaluation of afferent and efferent long-loop pathways in humans.

H Ackermann, H C Diener, J Dichgans.   

Abstract

Standing humans were subjected to sudden tilts of a platform toe-up. This resulted in a long-latency response in the anterior tibial muscle with a mean latency of 132 ms. The same physiological stimulus was applied to evoke cerebral potentials. The mechanically evoked potential was characterized by a positive peak with a mean latency of 76.4 ms. Absolute peak latencies were variable between subjects but the side difference after separate stimulation of both legs was only around 2 ms. The recording of both, mechanically evoked long-latency muscle responses and cerebral potentials allows a separate evaluation to be made of afferent and efferent central pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3725188     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90024-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  16 in total

1.  Cortical activation following a balance disturbance.

Authors:  S Quant; A L Adkin; W R Staines; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Maturation of lower extremity EMG responses to postural perturbations: relationship of response-latencies to development of fastest central and peripheral efferents.

Authors:  K Müller; V Hömberg; P Coppenrath; H G Lenard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neurophysiological evaluation of sensorimotor functions of the leg: comparison of evoked cortical potentials following electrical and mechanical stimulation, long-latency muscle responses, and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  H Ackermann; C Thomas; B Guschlbauer; J Dichgans
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Katsuo Fujiwara; Hidehito Tomita; Naoe Furune; Kenji Kunita; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Changes in sensorimotor functions after spinal lesions evaluated in terms of long-latency reflexes.

Authors:  H Ackermann; H C Diener; J Dichgans
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Neural mechanisms and functional correlates of altered postural responses to perturbed standing balance with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Carrie L Roy; Juvena R Hitt; Roman E Popov; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 10.  Do sensorimotor perturbations to standing balance elicit an error-related negativity?

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Lena H Ting; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.