Literature DB >> 3720107

Reimplantation in infection. Elution of gentamicin from cement and beads.

E A Salvati, J J Callaghan, B D Brause, R F Klein, R D Small.   

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to evaluate the arthroplasty fluid, serum, and urine antibiotic levels in 38 patients implanted with gentamicin-impregnated cement and in 18 patients with gentamicin-impregnated beads. Radioimmune assays were performed on arthroplasty fluid, serum, and urine samples at various times after surgery. On day 1, high arthroplasty fluid levels of gentamicin were eluted from bead-implanted patients (mean, 36.9 micrograms/ml; range, 19.6-69.5) and cement-implanted patients (mean, 14.9 micrograms/ml; range, 2.7-38.9) with very low serum and urine levels. The arthroplasty levels of gentamicin obtained in bead-implanted patients on day 1 were 17 times higher, and in cement-implanted patients, seven times higher, than those obtained with intravenous administration of gentamicin. The serum and urine levels were approximately ten to 20 times less in patients with gentamicin-impregnated cement or beads compared to those levels obtained after intravenous administration. These very low systemic levels should preclude nephrotoxic and ototoxic effects. No toxic effects were observed in these patients. Bioactivity of gentamicin in the specimens was confirmed. Staphylococci were exquisitely sensitive, while Streptococci were moderately resistant to gentamicin. Both gentamicin-impregnated beads and cement appear safe and provide substantial local in vivo antibacterial activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3720107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Treatment Options for Orthopedic Device-related Infections.

Authors:  Edna Toubes; John Segreti
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  [The infected hip prosthesis].

Authors:  S Ruchholtz; G Täger; D Nast-Kolb
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Post mesh herniorrhaphy infection control: are we doing all we can?

Authors:  Maximo Deysine
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  [Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  M Lenz; G O Hofmann; T Mückley
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  In vivo and in vitro studies of antibiotic release from and bacterial growth inhibition by antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate hip spacers.

Authors:  Jens Kelm; Thilo Regitz; Eduard Schmitt; Werner Jung; Konstantinos Anagnostakos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antibiotic-impregnated cement and beads for orthopedic infections.

Authors:  D A Wininger; R J Fass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Reinfected revised TKA resolves with an aggressive protocol and antibiotic infusion.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside; Tariq A Nayfeh; Renee LaZear; Marcel E Roy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cefoperazone sodium impregnated polycaprolactone composite implant for osteomyelitis.

Authors:  A Anand; R Pundir; C S Pandian; S Saraf; H Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.975

9.  Elution of gentamicin and vancomycin from polymethylmethacrylate beads and hip spacers in vivo.

Authors:  Konstantinos Anagnostakos; Philippe Wilmes; Eduard Schmitt; Jens Kelm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Complications after spacer implantation in the treatment of hip joint infections.

Authors:  Jochen Jung; Nora Verena Schmid; Jens Kelm; Eduard Schmitt; Konstantinos Anagnostakos
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.