Literature DB >> 2039292

Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.

H J Sugerman1, H H Newsome, G Decosta, A M Zfass.   

Abstract

Between March 1989 and August 1990, we performed 21 stapled J pouch ileonal procedures (20 ulcerative colitis [UC], 1 familial polyposis [FP]) without an ileostomy in 19, of whom 13 were taking prednisone and eight underwent semi-emergent surgery for uncontrollable bleeding. During the same time, an additional four patients required a standard ileonal procedure. The results of anal manometry and clinical function were compared to 25 patients who had previously undergone mucosal stripping and a sutured J pouch ileoanal anastomoses with a temporary diverting ileostomy between October 1982 and August 1990. During this same time period, an additional 19 patients underwent an anti-peristaltic reversed J pouch and 18 an S pouch, for a total of 83 ileoanal procedures. The reversed J pouch had a lower stool frequency than a standard J pouch but had an unacceptable incidence of complications and problems with pouch emptying. The S pouch had a stool frequency similar to the standard J pouch but provided greater length in patients with a short mesentery. Stapled J pouch ileoanal patients had a better (p less than 0.02) maximum and sphincter resting pressure (46 +/- 11 versus 34 +/- 12 mmHg), fewer (p less than 0.05) night-time accidents (22% versus 68%), daytime (17% versus 55%) or night-time (28 versus 61%) spotting, or use of a protective pad at night (11% versus 42%) than nonstapled J pouch ileoanal patients. Stool frequency was similar in the two groups. All but one UC patient had residual disease at the anastomosis. Anal mucosa between the dentate line and stapled anastomosis was 1.8 +/- 1.3 cm (range, 0 to 3.5 cm). Complications in the nonstapled J pouch group included 4 pouches excised (2 for complications, 2 for excessive stool frequency), 1 pelvic abscess, 2 stenosis requiring dilation under anesthesia, 1 enterocutaneous fistula after ileostomy closure, 1 ileostomy site hernia, and 2 small bowel obstructions. Of the 65 patients who underwent ileostomy closure in the entire series, 8 (12%) developed a complication requiring surgical intervention. Complications in the stapled group included 1 anastomotic leak, 1 pouch leak, and 1 pelvic abscess. Patients were managed successfully with drainage (all 3) and diverting ileostomy (1). One patient developed stenosis requiring dilation under anesthesia. The stapled J pouch ileoanal anastomosis is a simpler, safer procedure with less tension than a standard handsewn J pouch but leaves a very small cuff of residual disease. It provides significantly better stool control and may obviate the need for an ileostomy with its complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2039292      PMCID: PMC1358587          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  44 in total

1.  Restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy.

Authors:  W G Everett; S G Pollard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Total colectomy and mucosal proctectomy with preservation of continence in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  L W Martin; C LeCoultre; W K Schubert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Utsunomiya; T Iwama; M Imajo; S Matsuo; S Sawai; K Yaegashi; R Hirayama
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Preservation of anorectal continence following total colectomy.

Authors:  L W Martin; J E Fischer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The fate of the rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  J R Oakley; I C Lavery; V W Fazio; D G Jagelman; F L Weakley; K Easley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  D A Rothenberger; F D Vermeulen; C E Christenson; E G Balcos; F D Nemer; S M Goldberg; P Belliveau; S Nivatvongs; J L Schottler; D T Fang; H L Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Straight ileoanal anastomosis v ileal pouch--anal anastomosis after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy.

Authors:  B M Taylor; R W Beart; R R Dozois; K A Kelly; S F Phillips
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1983-06

8.  Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls; P Belliveau
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Ileoanal anastomosis in the adult.

Authors:  R W Beart; R R Dozois; K A Kelly
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1982-06

10.  Colectomy with rectal mucosectomy and ileoanal anastomosis in young patients. Its use for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.

Authors:  R L Telander; J Perrault
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1981-05
View more
  19 in total

1.  Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Saigusa; T Kurahashi; T Nakamura; H Sugimura; S Baba; H Konno; S Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience.

Authors:  David W Larson; Robert R Cima; Eric J Dozois; Michael Davies; Karen Piotrowicz; Sunni A Barnes; Bruce Wolff; John Pemberton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Inga Rossion; Käthe Gooßen; Daniel Saure; Jürgen Weitz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  U A Heuschen; U Hinz; E H Allemeyer; M Lucas; G Heuschen; C Herfarth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Management strategies for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  F C Nance
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.

Authors:  W T Reilly; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; W J Litchy; P B McIntyre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Early and long-term effects of colectomy and endorectal pullthrough on bile acid profile.

Authors:  R E Kelly; M Z Abedin; E W Fonkalsrud; J A Cates; K Saunders-Kirkwood; H Masuda; E J Huang; J K Dhiman; J J Roslyn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.