Literature DB >> 1744488

Pouch dynamics--a simple test of ileo-anal pouch evacuation.

M D Levitt1, M A Kamm, R J Nicholls.   

Abstract

A simple technique for quantifying ileo-anal pouch evacuation has been used to compare patients with good pouch function and fully spontaneous defaecation (n = 10) to patients with a symptomatic disorder of pouch evacuation (n = 10), usually due to a pouch-anal stricture (n = 7). Pouch emptying was significantly less efficient in those with disordered evacuation (median 54% evacuated) than in those with good function (median 98% evacuated, p = 0.02) and significantly slower (median 22.4 sec vs 5.2 sec to evacuate 75% of instilled barium, p less than 0.02) even when of comparable efficiency. Testing of four further patients with high stool frequency but neither stenosis nor symptomatic difficulty with evacuation excluded a significant disorder of evacuation in three but identified inefficient emptying in the fourth. This test may prove useful in the investigation of patients with poor pouch function of uncertain origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744488     DOI: 10.1007/bf00341237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S Choen; A Tsunoda; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. Factors affecting technical and functional outcome.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; Z Cohen; R S McLeod; H Stern; J Blair
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Comparison of clinical and compliance characteristics between S and W ileal reservoirs.

Authors:  B A Harms; A C Pahl; J R Starling
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Rectodynamics--quantifying rectal evacuation.

Authors:  M A Kamm; C I Bartram; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The sphincteric and sensory components of preserved continence after ileoanal reservoir.

Authors:  M Pescatori; A G Parks
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1984-06

6.  Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  S J Stryker; K A Kelly; S F Phillips; R R Dozois; R W Beart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  D G Nasmyth; D Johnston; P G Godwin; M F Dixon; A Smith; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Scintigraphic assessment of neorectal motor function.

Authors:  P R O'Connell; K A Kelly; M L Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 10.057

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ambulatory pouch and anal motility in patients with ileo-anal reservoirs.

Authors:  M D Levitt; M A Kamm; J R van der Sijp; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.