Literature DB >> 3699548

Why do patients with faecal impaction have faecal incontinence.

N W Read, L Abouzekry.   

Abstract

To elucidate the phenomenon of faecal incontinence in impacted patients, manometric, radiological and other investigations were carried out in 55 elderly patients, who had impacted masses of faeces in the rectum and were incontinent of faeces and 36 elderly control subjects with no anorectal problems. Maximum basal pressure and the maximum squeeze pressure in impacted patients were not significantly different from elderly controls. Sphincter pressures were no different after disimpaction than they were with faecal masses in situ, suggesting that leakage and soiling were not caused by stretching of the anal ring or prolonged reflex inhibition of anal tone by the faecal mass. The anorectal angle was more obtuse in impacted patients than in elderly controls though there was no greater degree of perineal descent. Anal and perianal sensation was impaired in impacted patients compared with controls. Rectal sensation was also impaired in the impacted patients in that the volume in a rectal balloon that could be perceived by the subject and the volume that gave rise to a desire to defecate were much higher in impacted patients than in controls. The rectal volume required to cause anal relaxation was lower in impacted patients compared with controls though there was no reduction in the volume at which anal relaxation failed to recover its resting tone. Rectal distension elicited external sphincter contractions in 53% impacted patients compared with 80% of controls. In conclusion, faecal soiling in patients with faecal impaction is probably related to the combination of an obtuse anorectal angle and the low anal pressures, normally found in the elderly and to impaired anorectal sensation which prevents conscious contraction of the external sphincter when the internal sphincter is relaxed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3699548      PMCID: PMC1433423          DOI: 10.1136/gut.27.3.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  14 in total

1.  The internal anal sphincter response: manometric studies on its normal physiology, neural pathways, and alteration in bowel disorders.

Authors:  M M SCHUSTER; T R HENDRIX; A I MENDELOFF
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Effect of irritant purgatives on the myenteric plexus in man and the mouse.

Authors:  B Smith
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea.

Authors:  N W Read; W V Harford; A C Schmulen; M G Read; C Santa Ana; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Biofeedback therapy for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Wald
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Differences in anal sphincter function and clinical presentation in patients with pelvic floor descent.

Authors:  D C Bartolo; N W Read; J A Jarratt; M G Read; T C Donnelly; A G Johnson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction in fecal incontinence and diabetes mellitus. Modification with biofeedback therapy.

Authors:  A Wald; A K Tunuguntla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Anorectal manometry results in defecation disorders.

Authors:  D Molnar; L S Taitz; O M Urwin; J K Wales
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency.

Authors:  M Read; N W Read; D C Barber; H L Duthie
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Role of anorectal sensation in preserving continence.

Authors:  M G Read; N W Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  A neurogenic factor in faecal incontinence in the elderly.

Authors:  J P Percy; M E Neill; T K Kandiah; M Swash
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 10.668

View more
  15 in total

1.  Clinical features of idiopathic megarectum and idiopathic megacolon.

Authors:  J M Gattuso; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  W M Sun; N W Read; P B Miner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Medical management of fecal incontinence in challenging populations: a review.

Authors:  David Lee; Gaurav Arora
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

4.  Anal function in geriatric patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  J A Barrett; J C Brocklehurst; E S Kiff; G Ferguson; E B Faragher
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; J J Janssen; E C Klinkenberg-Knol; H F Hoitsma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Fecal impaction.

Authors:  Zilla H Hussain; Diana A Whitehead; Brian E Lacy
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-09

Review 7.  Coexistence of constipation and incontinence in children and adults.

Authors:  S Nurko; S M Scott
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 8.  Constipation in elderly patients. Pathogenesis and management.

Authors:  A Wald
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Impaired rectal sensation in idiopathic faecal incontinence.

Authors:  E Hancke; M Schürholz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Management and prevention of fecal impaction.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.