Literature DB >> 6852463

Differences in anal sphincter function and clinical presentation in patients with pelvic floor descent.

D C Bartolo, N W Read, J A Jarratt, M G Read, T C Donnelly, A G Johnson.   

Abstract

Perineal descent is found in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and patients with the descending perineum syndrome, who have little or no incontinence but present with a symptom pattern that suggests obstructed defecation. To investigate why patients with perineal descent present in different ways, manometric, radiologic, and neurophysiologic studies were performed in 53 patients with radiologically proven perineal descent and 34 control subjects. Thirty-two patients exhibited incontinence to rectally infused saline, while 21 patients presented with obstructed defecation but exhibited no incontinence. Both patient groups exhibited similar degrees of perineal descent on straining and increases in the motor unit potential duration of the external anal sphincter, indicative of neuropathic damage. Both groups had an abnormal rectoanal inhibitory reflex and an abnormal anorectal angle, though the latter was more obtuse in idiopathic fecal incontinence. However, although patients with incontinence had lower maximum basal and maximum squeeze sphincter pressures than normal, these values were normal in patients with obstructed defecation. Our findings suggest that perineal descent and neuropathy are not necessarily associated with incontinence as long as sphincter pressures remain normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6852463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  44 in total

1.  The effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; M Shibusawa; G Kamiyama; M Kusano; Y Shimizu; T Yanaihara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-11

3.  Relationship between results of radiological pelvic floor study and anorectal manometry in patients consulting for constipation.

Authors:  J Y Touchais; P Ducrotte; J Weber; J P Louvel; P A Martin; M Benozio; P Denis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.

Authors:  G Brodén; A Dolk; B Holmström
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Physiology and pathophysiology of colonic motor activity (1).

Authors:  S K Sarna
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle.

Authors:  F Penninckx; C Debruyne; B Lestar; R Kerremans
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

7.  Diagnosis of anal sphincter defects by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in women with anal incontinence.

Authors:  Kumi Hotta; Ryoko Murayama; Mikako Yoshida; Hironobu Hyodo; Koichi Kobayashi; Megumi Haruna; Masayo Matsuzaki; Shiro Kozuma; Sachiyo Murashima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Differences in anal sensation in continent and incontinent patients with perineal descent.

Authors:  R Miller; D C Bartolo; F Cervero; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Functional anorectal disorders.

Authors:  Melissa L Times; Craig A Reickert
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

10.  Physiological studies in young women with chronic constipation.

Authors:  J J Bannister; J M Timms; L J Barfield; T C Donnelly; N W Read
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.