Literature DB >> 3688177

Adult age differences in visual acuity, stereopsis, and contrast sensitivity.

H A Greene1, D J Madden.   

Abstract

We investigated adult age differences in four measures of visual function: distance acuity, near acuity, stereopsis, and contrast sensitivity. Twenty-four young adults (mean age 19.5 years) and 24 older adults (mean age 68.4 years) participated. Age differences were present in each of the four measures. A stepwise discriminant analysis performed on the four measures revealed that, when the correlations among the measures were taken into account, only contrast sensitivity significantly discriminated young and older adults' performance. The strength of the correlations among the four measures was greater for older adults than for young adults. The results indicated that contrast sensitivity is a useful measure for detecting age-related changes in visual function and that a common mechanism may underlie age differences on various visual tests.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3688177     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198710000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  16 in total

1.  Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa; Santiago García-Lázaro; Alejandro Cerviño; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The effects of ageing on stereopsis. A VEP study.

Authors:  Naira A Taroyan; Subha Thiyagesh; Laurence Vigon; David Buckley; Peter W R Woodruff; Claire Young; Reza Saatchi; John P Frisby
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest.

Authors:  L Garnham; J J Sloper
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Self-reported Magic Eye stereogram skill predicts stereoacuity.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The Effect of Clinical Visual Stress on Stereoacuity Measured with the TNO Test.

Authors:  F Abd Manan; T C Jenkins; A J Collinge
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2001-07

Review 6.  At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Mark W Albers; Grover C Gilmore; Jeffrey Kaye; Claire Murphy; Arthur Wingfield; David A Bennett; Adam L Boxer; Aron S Buchman; Karen J Cruickshanks; Davangere P Devanand; Charles J Duffy; Christine M Gall; George A Gates; Ann-Charlotte Granholm; Takao Hensch; Roee Holtzer; Bradley T Hyman; Frank R Lin; Ann C McKee; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Lisa C Silbert; Robert G Struble; John Q Trojanowski; Joe Verghese; Donald A Wilson; Shunbin Xu; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 8.  Linking cognitive and visual perceptual decline in healthy aging: The information degradation hypothesis.

Authors:  Zachary A Monge; David J Madden
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  GABA levels in ventral visual cortex decline with age and are associated with neural distinctiveness.

Authors:  Jordan D Chamberlain; Holly Gagnon; Poortata Lalwani; Kaitlin E Cassady; Molly Simmonite; Rachael D Seidler; Stephan F Taylor; Daniel H Weissman; Denise C Park; Thad A Polk
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.133

10.  Human gaze following response is affected by visual acuity.

Authors:  Marcella Spoor; Behdokht Hosseini; Bart van Alphen; Maarten A Frens; Jos N van der Geest
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.