Literature DB >> 21061014

Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients.

Teresa Ferrer-Blasco1, David Madrid-Costa, Santiago García-Lázaro, Alejandro Cerviño, Robert Montés-Micó.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate stereoacuity in patients with bilateral implantation of an aspheric bifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
METHODS: Thirty patients scheduled for cataract surgery were implanted with the aspheric bifocal AcrySof ReSTOR IOL. Stereoacuity was measured using the vectographic Titmus and Random dot stereotests (fixed disparity) and the Howard–Dolman apparatus (threshold disparity) under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2) after phacoemulsification for cataract surgery in 30 patients with low astigmatism (≤1D). Visual acuity at distance and near was also examined. All patients were examined at 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean stereoacuity with the Titmus and the Random dot sterereotests was 44.55 ± 1.08 sec arc (range, from 40 to 80) and 41.25 ± 1.12 sec arc (range, from 20 to 70) respectively. The Howard–Dolman method showed a mean value of 18.42 ± 6.10 sec arc, ranging from 11 to 30 sec arc. No statistically significant differences were found between the Titmus and the Random dot sterereotests values (P = 0.189). However, these values differ significantly from that found using the Howard-Dolman method (P = 0.005). Visual acuity at distance and near was 0.04 ± 0.05 and 0.04 ± 0.04 logMAR (about 20/20) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite simultaneous images on the retina after bifocal IOL implantation, patients showed useful stereoacuity. This study confirms that retinal image blur associated with multifocality does not deteriorate stereoacuity. Stereoscopic threshold measurement with a Howard–Dolman apparatus is more accurate than vectographic tests when assessing stereoacuity after IOL surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21061014     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1558-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  29 in total

1.  Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial.

Authors:  Carlos E Souza; Cristina Muccioli; Eduardo S Soriano; Maria Regina Chalita; Filipi Oliveira; Lincoln L Freitas; Luci P Meire; Celina Tamaki; Rubens Belfort
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channeled?

Authors:  T Heckmann; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effect of vision therapy on stereophotogrammetric profiling--a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J J Saladin; D H Alspaugh; L R Penrod
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-05

4.  How contrast affects stereoacuity.

Authors:  D L Halpern; R R Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis.

Authors:  J V Lovasik; M Szymkiw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Weirong Chen; Qianli Meng; Haiyun Ye; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Prospective functional and clinical comparison of bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses in patients 70 years or younger.

Authors:  David F Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Enrique España; Inmaculada Bueno; W Neil Charman; José L Menezo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Effects of heterophoria on stereopsis.

Authors:  J J Saladin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Stereoacuity testing in the monofixation syndrome.

Authors:  W N Clarke; L P Noel
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography measurements with the LENTIS Mplus multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Eirini Skiadaresi; Colm McAlinden; Giuseppe Ravalico; Jonathan Moore
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Correct method for statistical analysis of stereopsis in ophthalmology research.

Authors:  Alireza Peyman; Mohammadreza Peyman; Mohammadreza Akhlaghi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of trifocal toric and bifocal toric intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high corneal astigmatism.

Authors:  Merve Bozkurt Gencer; Hikmet Basmak; Erdogan Yasar; Ozkan Onal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens.

Authors:  Béatrice Cochener; Jérome Vryghem; Pascal Rozot; Gilles Lesieur; Steven Heireman; Johan A Blanckaert; Emmanuel Van Acker; Sofie Ghekiere
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-03

5.  Laterality does not affect the depth perception, but interpupillary distance.

Authors:  Murat Aslankurt; Lokman Aslan; Adnan Aksoy; Murat Ozdemir; Senol Dane
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.