Literature DB >> 3688034

Parental perceptions of the burden of genetic disease.

E E Ekwo1, J O Kim, C A Gosselink.   

Abstract

Parents who are carriers of genes that code for genetic disease face a complex decision regarding procreation. To investigate how parents perceive the potential effects of having a child with congenital defects and how such perceptions influence their reproductive decisions, 202 women accepting and 50 women rejecting amniocentesis after genetic counseling were followed in a 3-year longitudinal study. Using multiple correspondence analysis, we found that perceived burdens associated with hypothetical congenital abnormalities leading to prolonged illness or early death were considered the most serious, those related to physical handicap or facial abnormalities were perceived as least serious, while genetic defects causing mental retardation fell between. The parents were increasingly likely to accept amniocentesis the more they felt they would be unable to cope with the consequences of a genetic disease leading to prolonged illness or mental retardation (R = .23). Overall, the women who accepted amniocentesis were those who perceived the consequences of congenital malformation as most burdensome. The findings suggest that genetic counselors should not only explore parents' attitudes about specific congenital abnormalities, but also their perceptions of how they would cope with the medical and social consequences of the various genetic defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3688034     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320280422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  10 in total

1.  Genetic counseling after abnormal prenatal diagnosis: facilitating coping in families who continue their pregnancies.

Authors:  Jill S Allen; Lynda C Mulhauser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "Respect for autonomy" in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal.

Authors:  Mary Terrell White
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Routine prenatal screening for congenital heart disease: what can be expected? A decision-analytic approach.

Authors:  E Buskens; E W Steyerberg; J Hess; J W Wladimiroff; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Perception of genetic risk among genetic counselors.

Authors:  J Roggenbuck; J E Olson; T A Sellers; C Ludowese
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Decision-making through dialogue: reconfiguring autonomy in genetic counseling.

Authors:  M T White
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-01

6.  Genetic diagnosis: present and prospects.

Authors:  A Robinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

Authors:  E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; G A Chase; R R Faden; G Geller; K J Hofman; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions.

Authors:  Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Variables influencing parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases before and after genetic counselling.

Authors:  R Saleem; R Gofin; Z Ben-Neriah; A Boneh
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.982

10.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  P T Dick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.